Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Arrow Theorem (1)
- Collective irrationality (1)
- Condorcet cycling (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Democractic decisionmaking (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- General Law (1)
- Impossibility Theorem (1)
- Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Kenneth J. Arrow (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Politics (1)
- Proposition 8 (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Ricci (1)
- Social Choice Theory (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
On Equality: The Anti-Interference Principle, Donald J. Kochan
On Equality: The Anti-Interference Principle, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
This Essay introduces the “Anti-Interference Principle” – a new term on the meaning of equality, or at least one not yet so-named in the equality lexicon – as a necessary foundation for achieving the goal of true equality. Equality has a long-standing place in the discussion of politics and jurisprudence and remains a struggle of definition today. Rather than rehash the mass of scholarship, this Essay seeks to summarize the general equality concept, and propose that the legal discourse on equality center on a requirement that governmental power must protect and respect equal treatment and opportunity, unconstrained, not equal outcomes. …