Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (8)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Legislation (8)
-
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Legal Biography (7)
- Legal History (7)
- Legal Writing and Research (7)
- Other Law (7)
- State and Local Government Law (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Legal Remedies (6)
- Common Law (4)
- Contracts (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (4)
- Keyword
-
- Black Law Student Association (5)
- Black Law Students (5)
- Black Laywers (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Symposium (5)
-
- Black Law Deans (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Criminal Justice System (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Crimmigration (1)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Defund the Police (1)
- Dilemmas (1)
- Duress (1)
- Education (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Equal Protectuion (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Force Confessions (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Marissa Jackson Sow (1)
- Prisonization of Schools (1)
- Public School System (1)
- School to Prison Pipeline (1)
- Witch Trials (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks.
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
Seattle University Law Review
The Deans' Roundtable.
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review
Marissa Jackson Sow’S “Whiteness As Contract”, Marissa Jackson Sow
Marissa Jackson Sow’S “Whiteness As Contract”, Marissa Jackson Sow
Seattle University Law Review
Marissa Jackson Sow’s “Whiteness as Contract.”
Closing Remarks, Dontay Proctor-Mills
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores what we coin “rock and hard place” (RHP) arguments in the law, and it aims to motivate mission-driven plaintiffs to seek out such arguments in their cases. The RHP argument structure helps plaintiffs win cases even when the court views that outcome as unfavorable.
We begin by dissecting RHP dilemmas that have long existed in the American legal system. As Part I reveals, prosecutors and law enforcement officials have often taken advantage of RHP dilemmas and used them as a tool to persuade criminal defendants to forfeit their constitutional rights, confess, or give up the chance to …
School “Safety” Measures Jump Constitutional Guardrails, Maryam Ahranjani
School “Safety” Measures Jump Constitutional Guardrails, Maryam Ahranjani
Seattle University Law Review
In the wake of George Floyd’s murder and efforts to achieve racial justice through systemic reform, this Article argues that widespread “security” measures in public schools, including embedded law enforcement officers, jump constitutional guardrails. These measures must be rethought in light of their negative impact on all children and in favor of more effective—and constitutionally compliant—alternatives to promote school safety. The Black Lives Matter, #DefundthePolice, #abolishthepolice, and #DefundSchoolPolice movements shine a timely and bright spotlight on how the prisonization of public schools leads to the mistreatment of children, particularly children with disabilities, boys, Black and brown children, and low-income children. …
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Seattle University Law Review
The doctrine of duress is common to other bodies of law, but the application of the duress doctrine is both unclear and highly unstable in immigration law. Outside of immigration law, a person who commits a criminal act out of well-placed fear of terrible consequences is different than a person who willingly commits a crime, but American immigration law does not recognize this difference. The lack of clarity leads to certain absurd results and demands reimagining, redefinition, and an unequivocal statement of the significance of duress in ascertaining culpability. While there are inevitably some difficult lines to be drawn in …