Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- American Federalism (1)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (1)
- Bar Exam (1)
- Black Law Students Association (1)
-
- Black Lawyers (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Grading (1)
- Hernández v. Mesa (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (1)
- LGBTQ Rights (1)
- Law School Grades (1)
- Model Toxics Control Act (1)
- Race Disproportionality (1)
- Racial Equity (1)
- Racial Reckoning (1)
- Spending Clause (1)
- Surrogacy Laws (1)
- Symposium (1)
- Takings Clause (1)
- U.S. Constitution’s Taxing and Spending Clause (1)
- Washington State (1)
- Washington Supreme Court (1)
- Washington’s Criminal Justice System (1)
- Washington’s Juvenile Legal System (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Case Law On American Indians, Thomas P. Schlosser
Case Law On American Indians, Thomas P. Schlosser
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Cost To Bear—Environmental Contamination And Eminent Domain, Evan C. Heaney
A Cost To Bear—Environmental Contamination And Eminent Domain, Evan C. Heaney
Seattle University Law Review
This Note advocates for Washington courts to adopt a system that universally allows evidence of environmental contamination on the private property taken in eminent domain proceedings. Part I of this Note discusses the history and progression of eminent domain and the broader constitutional roots of the Takings Clause. Part II explores Washington’s environmental remediation statute. Part III details the various approaches jurisdictions around the county have formulated to deal with this issue. Part IV argues Washington courts should adopt the inclusionary approach, which allows the introduction of environmental evidence in eminent domain proceedings.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Seattle University Law Review
This article introduces the proposal entitled Madison 2.0 which calls for an enlightened federal government to enact legislation—using its broad ability to tax and spend for the general welfare—to revitalize, as opposed to undermine, American federalism. Part I discusses American Federalism today and the need for an updated approach. Part II explores the government's dysfunctional response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Part III proposes how to revitalize American federalism through the Spending Clause. Part IV discusses how to claw back funds in situations of state recalcitrance and replacing funds with a basic income. Lastly, this article concludes by explaining why the …