Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Assessed deficiency (1)
- Bank branch (1)
- Bond (1)
- Book of account (1)
- Distraint power (1)
-
- Dominguez v. State (1)
- Extradition (1)
- Flora v. United States (1)
- Foreign bank (1)
- Full tax payment (1)
- Hot trail (1)
- Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (1)
- Internal Revenue Law of 1921 (1)
- La Follette Amendment (1)
- Lien (1)
- Maritime law (1)
- Oregon Workmen's Compensation Act (1)
- Partial payment (1)
- Penalty (1)
- Section 6321 (1)
- Separate entity theory (1)
- Ship (1)
- Ship Company v. Rhode (1)
- Statute of limitation (1)
- United States v. Rauscher (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Taxation-Federal Tax Liens-Section 6321 Of The Internal Revenue Code As Basis For Injunction Binding Assets Of Foreign Branch Of American Bank, Gerald J. Laba
Taxation-Federal Tax Liens-Section 6321 Of The Internal Revenue Code As Basis For Injunction Binding Assets Of Foreign Branch Of American Bank, Gerald J. Laba
Michigan Law Review
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued jeopardy assessments against the taxpayer, Omar, S.A., a Uruguayan corporation. To avoid payment, Omar began to liquidate its American-held assets by transferring receipts out of the country. Pursuant to its statutory right, under section 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, to impose a lien upon all property of a delinquent taxpayer, the United States brought suit against Omar and various New York banks in the domestic and foreign branches of which Omar's funds were deposited. The district court granted a preliminary injunction restraining certain of the banks from transferring any property whether …
Taxation - Federal Income Tax- Full Payment A Prerequisite To Refund Suit, Stuart S. Gunckel
Taxation - Federal Income Tax- Full Payment A Prerequisite To Refund Suit, Stuart S. Gunckel
Michigan Law Review
A tax deficiency of $28,908.60 including interest was levied by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against the petitioner for a single tax year. Petitioner paid $5,058.54 but later filed a claim for refund which was disallowed by the Commissioner. On suit by petitioner in a United States district court for the refund, the court held the petitioner was not entitled to the refund because the claimed losses were actually capital in nature. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and dismissed the complaint on the ground that the district court could not have jurisdiction until there had been …
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Michigan Law Review
Constitutionality of the LA Follette Amendment to the Internal Revenue Law of 1921 - The United States Senate on November 5, 1921, inserted in the Revenue Act, then before the Senate, a provision that taxpayers in their income tax returns must specify what state and municipal bonds they hold, or else be subject to a penalty of five per cent. That provision was dropped out in conference, but it will come up again, and it is well to look at its constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution prohibiting unreasonable searches.