Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- BLM (1)
- Bennett v. Spear (1)
- Bureau of Land Management (1)
- California (1)
- Canada (1)
-
- Coastal state (1)
- Conservation zone (1)
- Costa Rica (1)
- Eastern Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishing Agreement (1)
- Exclusive jurisdiction (1)
- FCMA (1)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (1)
- Fishing (1)
- Forest Service (1)
- GSA (1)
- Geothermal Steam Act (1)
- Highly migratory species (1)
- IATTC (1)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (1)
- International license (1)
- Lease continuation (1)
- Lease extension (1)
- Lease provisions (1)
- Lease requirements (1)
- Lexmark (1)
- Medicine Lake Highlands (1)
- Mexico (1)
- NEPA (1)
- NHPA (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Pit River Tribe V. Bureau Of Land Management, 793 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2015), Kathryn S. Ore
Pit River Tribe V. Bureau Of Land Management, 793 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2015), Kathryn S. Ore
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained the correct application of the zone of interests test and further solidified the importance of proper NEPA and NHPA analysis in geothermal leasing. The court reaffirmed that the BLM and the Forest Service must conduct additional cultural and environmental analysis when granting lease extensions under the Geothermal Steam Act. Furthermore, it rejected the BLM’s decision to grant forty-year lease continuations to unproven geothermal leases by treating them as a unit rather than individually.
Territorial Waters - Agreement Providing For The Issuance Of International Licenses For Fishing Tuna In The Eastern Pacific Ocean - An Attempt At Uniformity In An Area Where Conflicting Jurisdictional Claims Have Created Tensions And Conflicts, Gary L. Carter
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.