Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 28 U.S.C. §1331 (1)
- ATS (1)
- Alien Tort Statute (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate Jurisdiction (1)
-
- Article III (1)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Caperton v. Bowyer (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Criminalize (1)
- Decisions According to Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- Due process (1)
- Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1)
- European Law (1)
- Federal common law (1)
- Federal question (1)
- Georgia Court of Appeals (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
- Homosexual sodomy (1)
- Impact foreign affairs (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Judeo-Christian ethics (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law Reivew (1)
- Law Review (1)
- Law of nations (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Personal autonomy (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Jurisdiction Over U.S. Citizens' Claims For Violations Of The Law Of Nations In Light Of Sosa, Gwynne Skinner
Federal Jurisdiction Over U.S. Citizens' Claims For Violations Of The Law Of Nations In Light Of Sosa, Gwynne Skinner
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Historical Antecedents Of Challenges Facing The Georgia Appellate Courts, Michael B. Terry
Historical Antecedents Of Challenges Facing The Georgia Appellate Courts, Michael B. Terry
Georgia State University Law Review
The Georgia appellate courts face challenges common to many courts in these days of reduced governmental resources. At the same time, the Georgia appellate courts face unusual challenges that can be traced to their historical antecedents and one unique constitutional provision: the “Two-Term Rule.” Just as “[t]he law embodies the story of a nation’s development through many centuries,” the current rules and practices of both the Supreme Court of Georgia and the Court of Appeals of Georgia embody the story of the development of those courts since their founding.
Several aspects of the history of the courts directly impact the …
The Federal Rules At 75: Dispute Resolution, Private Enforcement Or Decisions According To Law?, James R. Maxeiner
The Federal Rules At 75: Dispute Resolution, Private Enforcement Or Decisions According To Law?, James R. Maxeiner
Georgia State University Law Review
This essay is a critical response to the 2013 commemorations of the75th anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were introduced in 1938 to provide procedure to decide cases on their merits. The Rules were designed to replace decisions under the “sporting theory of justice”with decisions according to law.
By 1976, at midlife, it was clear that they were not achieving their goal. America’s proceduralists split into two sides about what to do. One side promotes rules that control and conclude litigation: e.g.,plausibility pleading, case management, limited discovery, cost indemnity for discovery, and summary …