Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
-
- Practice and Procedure (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Cloud Computing (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Costs (1)
- Court costs (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Data (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Eighth amendment (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fees (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
Jones, Lackey, And Teague, Richard Broughton
Jones, Lackey, And Teague, Richard Broughton
Richard Broughton
In a recent, high-profile ruling, a federal court finally recognized that a substantial delay in executing a death row inmate violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishments. Courts have repeatedly rejected these so-called “Lackey claims,” making the federal court’s decision in Jones v. Chappell all the more important. And yet it was deeply flawed. This paper focuses on one of the major flaws in the Jones decision that largely escaped attention: the application of the non-retroactivity rule from Teague v. Lane. By comprehensively addressing the merits of the Teague bar as applied to Lackey claims, and making …
The Un-Territoriality Of Data, Jennifer Daskal
The Un-Territoriality Of Data, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Territoriality looms large in our jurisprudence, particularly as it relates to the government’s authority to search and seize. Fourth Amendment rights turn on whether the search or seizure takes place territorially or extraterritorially; the government’s surveillance authorities depend on whether the target is located within the United States or without; and courts’ warrant jurisdiction extends, with limited exceptions, only to the borders’ edge. Yet the rise of electronic data challenges territoriality at its core. Territoriality, after all, depends on the ability to define the relevant “here” and “there,” and it presumes that the “here” and “there” have normative significance. The …