Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Appeals (2)
- 2004 Supreme Court term (1)
- American History (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Appellate Court (1)
-
- Appellate Jurisdiction (1)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Chemerinsky (1)
- Chief justice (1)
- Composition of the court (1)
- Congress enforcement power (1)
- Conservative court (1)
- Constitutional rulings (1)
- Criminalize (1)
- Discretionary Review (1)
- Due process (1)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
- Federal power (1)
- Federal statute (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Georgia Court of Appeals (1)
- Gonzales v. Raich (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
- Homosexual sodomy (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Interlocutory Review (1)
- Judeo-Christian ethics (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial deference (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Confusing Standards For Discretionary Review In Washington And A Proposed Framework For Clarity, Judge Stephen Dwyer
The Confusing Standards For Discretionary Review In Washington And A Proposed Framework For Clarity, Judge Stephen Dwyer
Seattle University Law Review
It has now been more than thirty-five years since the Washington Rules of Appellate Procedure (RAP) became effective in 1976 and replaced all prior rules governing appellate procedure. One significant change that those rules made was to clearly describe and delineate a procedural mechanism for seeking interlocutory review of trial court decisions. The ultimate effect on practitioners is both obvious and unavoidable. Many lawyers, rather than stake out a clear position regarding the applicability of the various considerations governing discretionary review, simply argue that any and every consideration that is even arguably applicable is satisfied by the trial court’s determination. …
Historical Antecedents Of Challenges Facing The Georgia Appellate Courts, Michael B. Terry
Historical Antecedents Of Challenges Facing The Georgia Appellate Courts, Michael B. Terry
Georgia State University Law Review
The Georgia appellate courts face challenges common to many courts in these days of reduced governmental resources. At the same time, the Georgia appellate courts face unusual challenges that can be traced to their historical antecedents and one unique constitutional provision: the “Two-Term Rule.” Just as “[t]he law embodies the story of a nation’s development through many centuries,” the current rules and practices of both the Supreme Court of Georgia and the Court of Appeals of Georgia embody the story of the development of those courts since their founding.
Several aspects of the history of the courts directly impact the …
The Rule Of Law And The Judicial Function In The World Today, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain
The Rule Of Law And The Judicial Function In The World Today, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain
Notre Dame Law Review
The world’s oldest written constitution still in effect has many inspiring lines, but perhaps the one that most stirs the souls of the patriotic appears in Article 30. Delineating a familiar separation of powers, that Article forbids the legislative, executive, and judicial branches from swapping or mixing functions. “[T]o that end”—and here’s the line—“it may be a government of laws and not of men.” John Adams, the author of that line and most of the rest of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, penned those words in 1779, eight years before the adoption of the second oldest written constitution …