Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King (1)
- Calder v. Jones (1)
- Compuserve Inc. v. Patterson (1)
- Core-Vent Corp. v. Nobel Industries (1)
- Cybersell Inc. v. Cybersell Inc (1)
-
- Heroes Inc. v. Heroes Foundation (1)
- ISP (1)
- Inset Systems v. Instruction Set (1)
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Marina Salina Cruz (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Internet Service Provider (1)
- L.P. v. Toeppen (1)
- Mallinckrodt Medical Inc. v. Sonus Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Panavision International (1)
- Pennoyer v. Neff (1)
- Quality Solutions Inc. v. Zupanc (1)
- SRA (1)
- Shareware Registration Agreement (1)
- Smith v. Hobby Lobby Stores (1)
- Transnational law (1)
- Worldwide Volkswagen Corp v. Woodson (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
A Nice Place To Visit But I Wouldn't Want To Litigate There: The Effects Of Cybersell V. Cybersell On The Law Of Personal Jurisdiction, W. David Falcon Jr.
A Nice Place To Visit But I Wouldn't Want To Litigate There: The Effects Of Cybersell V. Cybersell On The Law Of Personal Jurisdiction, W. David Falcon Jr.
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In a world divided by barriers of language and culture, the Internet is the nexus that connects the most rural outposts of technology to the global business centers. The Internet's most popular user interface, the World Wide Web, is an interwoven network of computers through which news and information can traverse international barriers in a matter of seconds. Using an Internet Service Provider ("ISP") and a personal computer, the average user can access the World Wide Web and enter the largest repository of public information on the planet. The boundaries are virtually limitless, and the general absence of content restrictions …
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Preclusion Doctrine, Antisuit Injunctions, And Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals In Transnational Intellectual Property Litigation, Peter Nicolas
Articles
Conflicting standards among the federal circuits over the applicability of inherent powers in the transnational intellectual property context and the divided authority regarding the jurisdiction of U.S. federal courts over foreign intellectual property claims severely hamper the ability of federal district courts to use these tools in such a manner so as to prevent parties in transnational intellectual property suits from engaging in strategic behavior. This Comment seeks to reconcile these conflicts where possible and, where irreconcilable, to demonstrate that the text and history of federal statutes conferring subject matter jurisdiction on federal courts and placing limits on their issuance …