Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alyaa Chace (1)
- Anticipatory futures (1)
- CARICOM ten-point plan (1)
- Chace (1)
- Colonialism (1)
-
- Culture of denial (1)
- Customary international law (1)
- Day (1)
- Dominque Day (1)
- Enslaved Africans (1)
- Enslavement (1)
- Exploitation (1)
- Extraterritorial limitation (1)
- Human right (1)
- Is extraterritoriality the golden ticket out of corporate liability? How the modern-day Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory evaded liability under the Alien Tort Statute in Nestlé v. Doe (1)
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (1)
- Law and policy (1)
- Moral wound (1)
- Multinational (1)
- Okpabi (1)
- Public imaginary (1)
- Racial atrocity (1)
- Racial bias (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Racial hierarchy (1)
- Racial inequity (1)
- Redress (1)
- Social constructs (1)
- Systemic racism (1)
- Taxonomies (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Taxonomy And Restorative Justice: Can We Even See The Problem?, Dominique Day
Taxonomy And Restorative Justice: Can We Even See The Problem?, Dominique Day
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Is Extraterritoriality The Golden Ticket Out Of Corporate Liability? How The Modern-Day Willy Wonka’S Chocolate Factory Evaded Liability Under The Alien Tort Statute In Nestlé V. Doe, Alyaa Chace
Touro Law Review
The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) was drafted as part of the Judiciary Act of 1789. It was intended to provide federal courts with the jurisdiction to hear civil actions brought by foreign plaintiffs for torts committed in violation of the law of nations or other United States treaty. After a two-hundred-year dormancy period, the Statute has since been revived and become a vehicle by which foreign plaintiffs seek redress for environmental and human rights offenses carried out on foreign soil, often at the hands of United States corporations. However, the Supreme Court continues to limit the reach of the Statute, …