Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- TORT LAW IN INDIA (2)
- 32.1 (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights (1)
-
- Clearly established (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- False Imprisonment (1)
- False Imprisonment as a Tort (1)
- General Law (1)
- Hindu Succession Act (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- LAND RIGHTS (1)
- Land Transfer Regulation Act (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- PERSONAL LAWS IN INDIA (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Published (1)
- Remedies for False Imprisonment in India (1)
- Section 1983 (1)
- Section 4 (1)
- Tribal land laws in Andhra Pradesh (1)
- Unpublished (1)
- Women inheritence rights (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
False Imprisonment As A Tort In India, Hari Priya
False Imprisonment As A Tort In India, Hari Priya
Hari Priya
The tort of false imprisonment is one of the most severe forms of human rights violation, and this paper aims to define and to understand the concept of false imprisonment as a tort in India. It also seeks to know about the evolution of the notion of false imprisonment as a tort, with reference to Indian and foreign cases, and understand who and when can one be held liable for the tort of false imprisonment. It further deals with the remedies available for the said tort.
Tribal Land Laws In Andhra Pradesh, Hari Priya
Section 4 Of The Hindu Succession Act Of 1956, Hari Priya
Section 4 Of The Hindu Succession Act Of 1956, Hari Priya
Hari Priya
A brief write up in the form of a comprehensive article aiming to critically evaluate the Section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. The law, as it stands amended, has not only brought about changes in the succession laws of Hindus, but has also paved the way for some positive modifications in the law of partition, alienation of property, inheritance and adoption, and the paper is an effort to evaluate this provision of the law.
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
David R. Cleveland
While unpublished opinions are now freely citeable under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, their precedential value remains uncertain. This ambiguity muddles the already unclear law surrounding qualified immunity and denies courts valuable precedents for making fair and consistent judgments on these critical civil rights issues. When faced with a claim that they have violated a person’s civil rights, government officials typically claim qualified immunity. The test is whether they have violated “clearly established law.” Unfortunately, the federal circuits differ on whether unpublished opinions may be used in determining clearly established law. This article, Clear as Mud: How the Uncertain …