Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Dispute Resolution (2)
- International Law (2)
- ADR (1)
- Alternative litigation financing (1)
- Chevron Corporation (1)
-
- Civil litigation (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Conciliation (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law, Generally (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Courts (1)
- Economics (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Foreign judgment (1)
- Full faith and credit (1)
- Human rights (1)
- International Trade (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisdictional competition (1)
- Laundering (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legislation (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
„Zuerst Schlichten, Dann Richten“: O Modelo Suíço De Solução De Litígios Pré-Processual É Adequado Para O Brasil?, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
„Zuerst Schlichten, Dann Richten“: O Modelo Suíço De Solução De Litígios Pré-Processual É Adequado Para O Brasil?, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Dieser Aufsatz analysiert die Schlichtung und die Mediation in der Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung.
Holding Corporations To Account. Crafting Ats Suits In The Uk, Simon J. Baughen
Holding Corporations To Account. Crafting Ats Suits In The Uk, Simon J. Baughen
Simon J Baughen
This is an updated version of the existing publication which has been amended in the light of the decision of the US Supreme Court on 17 April 2013 in Kiobel. It will be published in the Fall 2013 edition of the British Journal of American Legal Studies
Ending Judgment Arbitrage: Jurisdictional Competition And The Enforcement Of Foreign Money Judgments In The United States, Gregory Shill
Ending Judgment Arbitrage: Jurisdictional Competition And The Enforcement Of Foreign Money Judgments In The United States, Gregory Shill
Gregory Shill
Recent multi-billion-dollar damage awards issued by foreign courts against large American companies have focused attention on the once-obscure, patchwork system of enforcing foreign-country judgments in the United States. That system’s structural problems are even more serious than its critics have charged. However, the leading proposals for reform overlook the positive potential embedded in its design.
In the United States, no treaty or federal law controls the domestication of foreign judgments; the process is instead governed by state law. Although they are often conflated in practice, the procedure consists of two formally and conceptually distinct stages: foreign judgments must first be …