Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Does Judicial Philosophy Matter?: A Case Study, Francisco J. Benzoni, Christopher S. Dodrill
Does Judicial Philosophy Matter?: A Case Study, Francisco J. Benzoni, Christopher S. Dodrill
West Virginia Law Review
A leading theory in the study of judicial behavior is the attitudinal model. This theory maintains that a judge's political ideology can be used to predict how a judge will decide certain cases; other factors, such as the judge's judicial philosophy, tend to be unimportant. Under this theory, two judges with the same political ideology, but different judicial philosophies, should virtually always vote the same way in cases with predicted ideological outcomes. This manuscript tests the attitudinal model by examining opinions by two judges with very similar political ideologies but different judicial philosophies: Judge Michael Luttig and Judge Harvie Wilkinson …
Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Review: The State Of The Debate, Circa 2009, Charles D. Kelso, R. Randall Kelso
Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Review: The State Of The Debate, Circa 2009, Charles D. Kelso, R. Randall Kelso
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Judicial Philosophy: People-Oriented Justice, Larry V. Starcher
A Judicial Philosophy: People-Oriented Justice, Larry V. Starcher
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brennan V. Scalia, Justice Or Jurisprudence? A Moderate Proposal, Travis A. Knobbe
Brennan V. Scalia, Justice Or Jurisprudence? A Moderate Proposal, Travis A. Knobbe
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.