Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (38)
- Courts (31)
- Supreme Court of the United States (23)
- Legal History (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
-
- State and Local Government Law (12)
- Law and Society (10)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Civil Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (8)
- Rule of Law (8)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Criminal Law (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Social Welfare Law (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Health Law and Policy (4)
- President/Executive Department (4)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- Food and Drug Law (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Agency (2)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (30)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (30)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 60
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Alito Versus Roe V. Wade: Dobbs As A Means Of Circumvention, Avoidance, Attenuation And Betrayal Of The Constitution, Antony Hilton
Alito Versus Roe V. Wade: Dobbs As A Means Of Circumvention, Avoidance, Attenuation And Betrayal Of The Constitution, Antony Hilton
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
There can be no argument that Justice Alito is a learned justice of great knowledge and reason, and has a superb grasp of the law. As such, despite any opposition to or disagreement with his legal opinions, he is deserving of respect for his intellectual prowess, in general and as it relates to the Constitution. Notwithstanding all the aforementioned, wrong is wrong.
Situating Structural Challenges To Agency Authority Within The Framework Of The Finality Principle, Harold J. Krent
Situating Structural Challenges To Agency Authority Within The Framework Of The Finality Principle, Harold J. Krent
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Ghost Of John Hart Ely, Ryan D. Doerfler, Samuel Moyn
The Ghost Of John Hart Ely, Ryan D. Doerfler, Samuel Moyn
Vanderbilt Law Review
The ghost of John Hart Ely haunts the American liberal constitutional imagination. Despite the failure long ago of any progressive constitutional vision in an increasingly conservative Supreme Court, Ely’s conjectures about the superiority of judges relative to legislatures in the protection of minorities and the policing of the democratic process remain second nature. Indeed, they have been credible enough among liberals to underwrite an anxious or even hostile attitude toward judicial reform. In order to exorcise Ely’s ghost and lay it to rest, this Article challenges his twin conjectures. First, the Article argues that there is little historical and no …
The Nature Of Standing, Matthew Hall, Christian Turner
The Nature Of Standing, Matthew Hall, Christian Turner
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Most academic studies of standing have focused on restrictions on federal court jurisdiction drawn from Article III of U.S. Constitution and related doctrinal schemes developed by state courts. These rules are constructed atop a few words of the Constitution: "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity," arising under various circumstances. The Supreme Court has interpreted these words to require federal courts to assess whether a plaintiff has suffered an injury in fact that is both fairly traceable to the actions of the defendant and redressable by a favorable ruling before proceeding to the merits of …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents and Special Thanks.
Keeping Up: Walking With Justice Douglas, Charles A. Reich
Keeping Up: Walking With Justice Douglas, Charles A. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Charles Reich, New Dealer, John Q. Barrett
An Unfair Cross Section: Federal Jurisdiction For Indian Country Crimes Dismantles Jury Community Conscience, Alana Paris
An Unfair Cross Section: Federal Jurisdiction For Indian Country Crimes Dismantles Jury Community Conscience, Alana Paris
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, federal jury pools must reflect a fair cross section of the community in which a crime is prosecuted and from which no distinct group in the community is excluded. The community in which a crime is prosecuted varies widely in Indian country based on legislative reforms enacted by Congress to strip indigenous populations of their inherent sovereignty. Under the Major Crimes Act, the federal government has the right to adjudicate all serious crimes committed by one American Indian against another American Indian or non-Indian within Indian country. American Indian defendants under …
Scholarship In Review: A Response To David S. Schwartz's The Spirit Of The Constitution: John Marshall And The 200-Year Odyssey Of Mcculloch V. Maryland, Law Review Editors
Scholarship In Review: A Response To David S. Schwartz's The Spirit Of The Constitution: John Marshall And The 200-Year Odyssey Of Mcculloch V. Maryland, Law Review Editors
Arkansas Law Review
We are elated to introduce, and the Arkansas Law Review is honored to publish, this series discussing and applauding David S. Schwartz’s new book: The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. Maryland. Schwartz sets forth meticulous research, coupled with unparalleled insight, into the opinion penned by Chief Justice John Marshall and details the winding path Marshall’s words have traveled over the past 200 years. Schwartz argues that the shifting interpretations of McCulloch, often shaped to satisfy the needs of the time, echoes the true spirit of the Constitution.
The Opioid Litigation: The Fda Is Mia, Catherine M. Sharkey
The Opioid Litigation: The Fda Is Mia, Catherine M. Sharkey
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
It is readily agreed that federal preemption of state tort law alters the balance between federal and state power. Federal preemption is a high-profile defense in almost all modern products liability cases. It is thus surprising to see how little attention has been given to federal preemption by courts and commentators in the opioid litigation. Opioid litigation provides a lens through which I explore the role of state and federal courts and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in striking the right balance of power. My purpose here is not to resolve the divide among the few courts that have …
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others, Edwin L. Felter Jr., Oyku Didem Aydin
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others, Edwin L. Felter Jr., Oyku Didem Aydin
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Why Amending The Consitution To Overrule Citizens United Is The Wrong Way To Fix Campaign Finance In The United States, Zachary Hale
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Great Use And Interest: Constitutional Governance And Judicial Power- The History Of The California Supreme Court, Donald Warner
Of Great Use And Interest: Constitutional Governance And Judicial Power- The History Of The California Supreme Court, Donald Warner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Justice Brandeis And Railroad Accidents: Fairness, Uniformity And Consistency, Larry Zacharias
Justice Brandeis And Railroad Accidents: Fairness, Uniformity And Consistency, Larry Zacharias
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Louis Brandeis And Contemporary Antitrust Enforcement, Kenneth G. Elzinga, Micah Webber
Louis Brandeis And Contemporary Antitrust Enforcement, Kenneth G. Elzinga, Micah Webber
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword To The Conference: Louis D. Brandeis: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective, Samuel J. Levine
Foreword To The Conference: Louis D. Brandeis: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective, Samuel J. Levine
Touro Law Review
On March 31-April 1, 2016, Touro Law Center and the Jewish Law Institute hosted a national conference: Louis D. Brandeis: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective. More than thirty judges, lawyers, and scholars, across a broad range of disciplines and hailing from across the United States, explored a variety of themes that included, among others: Brandeis’s groundbreaking work as a lawyer and a scholar; his commitment to his Jewish heritage; his historic appointment to the United States Supreme Court; and his jurisprudence on the Court. In addition to the timeless quality of these themes, the timing of the conference was significant, taking place …
The Judicial Legacy Of Louis Brandeis And The Nature Of American Constitutionalism, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
The Judicial Legacy Of Louis Brandeis And The Nature Of American Constitutionalism, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Solving A Mystery: Justice Brandeis’ Approach To Judicial Decision-Making, Judge Kermit V. Lipez
Solving A Mystery: Justice Brandeis’ Approach To Judicial Decision-Making, Judge Kermit V. Lipez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Brandeis And Civic Duty In A Pluralistic Society, Joel K. Goldstein
Justice Brandeis And Civic Duty In A Pluralistic Society, Joel K. Goldstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Continuing Vitality Of Louis D. Brandeis’S Free Expression Jurisprudence, Frederick M. Lawrence
The Continuing Vitality Of Louis D. Brandeis’S Free Expression Jurisprudence, Frederick M. Lawrence
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sunlight And Shadows: Louis D. Brandeis On Privacy, Publicity, And Free Expression In American Democracy, Erin Coyle
Sunlight And Shadows: Louis D. Brandeis On Privacy, Publicity, And Free Expression In American Democracy, Erin Coyle
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Moving From A Brandeis Brief To A Brandeis Law Firm: Challenges And Opportunities For Holistic Legal Services In The United States, Judith A. Mcmorrow
Moving From A Brandeis Brief To A Brandeis Law Firm: Challenges And Opportunities For Holistic Legal Services In The United States, Judith A. Mcmorrow
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.