Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Applied Behavior Analysis (1)
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms (1)
-
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminology (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Economics (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Psychiatry and Psychology (1)
- Psychological Phenomena and Processes (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Keyword
-
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Civil rights cases (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Deterrence and incapacitation (1)
- Efficiency (1)
-
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Forensic psychiatry (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Indigent clients (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Justifications for blame and punishment (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1)
- Nonpaternalistic and paternalistic rehabilitation (1)
- Remorse and forensic practice (1)
- Representation (1)
- Restitution (1)
- Retribution (1)
- Sentencing (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Commentary: Reflections On Remorse, Stephen J. Morse
Commentary: Reflections On Remorse, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
This commentary on Zhong et al. begins by addressing the definition of remorse. It then primarily focuses on the relation between remorse and various justifications for punishment commonly accepted in Anglo-American jurisprudence and suggests that remorse cannot be used in a principled way in sentencing. It examines whether forensic psychiatrists have special expertise in evaluating remorse and concludes that they do not. The final section is a pessimistic meditation on sentencing disparities, which is a striking finding of Zhong et al.
Roadblocks To Access To Justice: Reforming Ethical Rules To Meet The Special Needs Of Low-Income Clients, Louis S. Rulli
Roadblocks To Access To Justice: Reforming Ethical Rules To Meet The Special Needs Of Low-Income Clients, Louis S. Rulli
All Faculty Scholarship
The nation’s growing justice gap has left the poor with far too little access to legal representation, even in the most serious of civil matters. With poverty rates approaching their highest levels in the last fifty years, the poor struggle to hold on to their homes, their jobs, and their families, frequently overmatched by superior resources and an abundance of opposing lawyers representing corporations, government, and well-heeled interests. Non-profit lawyers struggle to provide limited assistance to the poor in high volume, community settings, or in courtroom corridors and on telephone hot lines. It is in these non-traditional settings that lawyers …
Rethinking Summary Judgment Empirics: The Life Of The Parties, Jonah B. Gelbach
Rethinking Summary Judgment Empirics: The Life Of The Parties, Jonah B. Gelbach
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.