Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Actuarial tests (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
-
- Douglas McKeon (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Institutionalization (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Jury attitudes (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislative reform (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Medical personnel (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- New York (1)
- New York State courts (1)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Right to experts (1)
- SVPA laws (1)
- Sex offender law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Sexually violent predator acts (1)
- Therapeutic jurisprudence (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
“Far From The Turbulent Space”: Considering The Adequacy Of Counsel In The Representation Of Individuals Accused Of Being Sexually Violent Predators, Michael L. Perlin, Heather Ellis Cucolo
“Far From The Turbulent Space”: Considering The Adequacy Of Counsel In The Representation Of Individuals Accused Of Being Sexually Violent Predators, Michael L. Perlin, Heather Ellis Cucolo
Michael L Perlin
Abstract:
For the past thirty years, the US Supreme Court's standard of Strickland v. Washington has governed the question of adequacy of counsel in criminal trials. There, in a Sixth Amendment analysis, the Supreme Court acknowledged that simply having a lawyer assigned to a defendant was not constitutionally adequate, but that that lawyer must provide "effective assistance of counsel," effectiveness being defined, pallidly, as requiring simply that counsel's efforts be “reasonable” under the circumstances. The benchmark for judging an ineffectiveness claim is simply “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper function of the adversarial process that the trial court cannot …
Positive Prognosis For Judges: A Look Into Judge-Directed Negotiations In Medical Malpractice Cases, Kristine Gamboa
Positive Prognosis For Judges: A Look Into Judge-Directed Negotiations In Medical Malpractice Cases, Kristine Gamboa
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
The article examines the effectiveness of the judge-directed negotiation program in the Unified Court System of New York State under the analysis of various medical malpractice lawsuits, which plays a vital role in the legislational reform in the field of medical malpractice. It informs that Douglas McKeon, Judge of the Bronx County Supreme Court had developed the concept of judge-directed negotiations. It overviews the praises and criticisms behind the success of the program.