Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Amendment 80 (2)
- Elections (2)
- African Americans (1)
- Appointed (1)
- Arkansas Campaign Practices Act (1)
-
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Best interest of child (1)
- Campaign contributions (1)
- Child custody (1)
- Child support (1)
- Commonwealth (1)
- Constitutional violations (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Elect (1)
- Elective judiciary (1)
- Electoral processes (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Governor (1)
- Interest groups (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial appointee (1)
- Judicial campaigns (1)
- Judicial elections (1)
- Judicial ethics (1)
- Judicial misconduct (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial selection (1)
- Legislature (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Reconsidering Virginia Judicial Selection, Carl W. Tobias
Reconsidering Virginia Judicial Selection, Carl W. Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Amendment 80 Judicial Politics In Arkansas: Have The Changes Undermined The Argument For Selection By Appointment?, Jay Barth
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Counting Votes Doesn't Add Up: A Response To Cox And Miles' Judging The Voting Rights Act, Ellen D. Katz, Anna Baldwin
Why Counting Votes Doesn't Add Up: A Response To Cox And Miles' Judging The Voting Rights Act, Ellen D. Katz, Anna Baldwin
Articles
In Judging the Voting Rights Act, Professors Adam B. Cox and Thomas J. Miles report that judges are more likely to find liability under section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when they are African American, appointed by a Democratic president, or sit on an appellate panel with a judge who is African American or a Democratic appointee. Cox and Miles posit that their findings “contrast” and “cast doubt” on much of the “conventional wisdom” about the Voting Rights Act, by which they mean the core findings we reported in Documenting Discrimination in Voting: Judicial Findings Under Section 2 …