Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Politics (3)
- Independence (2)
- Judges (2)
- Judicial independence (2)
- Virginia (2)
-
- Abolition (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Anti-tax (1)
- Appointments (1)
- Appropriation (1)
- Badges and incidents of slavery (1)
- Biography (1)
- Buckley v. Valeo (1)
- Budget (1)
- Campaign Finance Reform (1)
- Campaigns (1)
- Carrico (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clarence Thomas (1)
- Conservative (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional duty (1)
- Constitutional provisions (1)
- Court (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crisis (1)
- Economics (1)
- Editorial (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Foreseeing Greatness? Measurable Performance Criteria And The Selection Of Supreme Court Justices, James J. Brudney
Foreseeing Greatness? Measurable Performance Criteria And The Selection Of Supreme Court Justices, James J. Brudney
The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Working Paper Series
This article contributes to an ongoing debate about the feasibility and desireability of measuring the "merit" of appellate judges--and their consequent Supreme Court potential--by using objective performance variables. Relying on the provocative and controversial "tournament criteria" proposed by Professors Stephen Choi and Mitu Gulati in two recent articles, Brudney assesses the "Supreme Court potential" of Warren Burger and Harry Blackmun based on their appellate court records. He finds that Burger's appellate performance appears more promising under the Choi and Gulati criteria, but then demonstrates how little guidance these quantitative assessments actually provide when reviewing the two men's careers on the …
The Personality Of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Aubrey Immelman, Jamie Thielman
The Personality Of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Aubrey Immelman, Jamie Thielman
Psychology Faculty Publications
This paper presents the results of an indirect assessment of the personality of U.S. Supreme Court associate justice Clarence Thomas, from the conceptual perspective of Theodore Millon.
Information concerning Justice Thomas was collected from biographical sources, speeches, and published reports and synthesized into a personality profile using the second edition of the Millon Inventory of Diagnostic Criteria (MIDC), which yields 34 normal and maladaptive personality classifications congruent with Axis II of DSM-IV.
The personality profile yielded by the MIDC was analyzed on the basis of interpretive guidelines provided in the MIDC and Millon Index of Personality Styles manuals. Justice …
To Elect Or Not To Elect: A Case Study Ofjudicial Selection In New York City 1977-2002, Steven Zeidman
To Elect Or Not To Elect: A Case Study Ofjudicial Selection In New York City 1977-2002, Steven Zeidman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article examines the process of judicial selection in New York State in light of the recent court decisions in White and Spargo, which have paved the way for increased campaign speech in judicial elections. Relying on empirical data to compare judicial elections and appointments in New York City between 1977 and 2002, the Article finds that elections produce a judiciary that is more beholden to interest groups than one generated through appointments. The consequence of this greater special interest involvement is an erosion of public trust and confidence in the judiciary. Moreover while elections arguably have increased diversity in …
Legislative Restraint In The Confirmation Process, Kenneth W. Starr
Legislative Restraint In The Confirmation Process, Kenneth W. Starr
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Three Independences, H. Jefferson Powell
The Three Independences, H. Jefferson Powell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence, William H. Rehnquist
Judicial Independence, William H. Rehnquist
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preserving The Legacy: A Tribute To Chief Justice Harry L. Carrico, One Who Exalted Judicial Independence, Penny J. White
Preserving The Legacy: A Tribute To Chief Justice Harry L. Carrico, One Who Exalted Judicial Independence, Penny J. White
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mixed Signals: Reconsidering The Political Economy Of Judicial Deference To Administrative Agencies, Matthew C. Stephenson
Mixed Signals: Reconsidering The Political Economy Of Judicial Deference To Administrative Agencies, Matthew C. Stephenson
ExpressO
This paper investigates rational choice explanations for patterns of Supreme Court decision-making with respect to the appropriate level of judicial deference to administrative agency decisions. In particular, I assess empirically the thesis that the Supreme Court expands deference when the Supreme Court is ideologically closer to the executive than to the circuit courts, and contracts deference when the opposite is true. I find little to no evidence supporting this "rational choice" theory of judicial deference. Given this surprising null finding, I offer alternative explanations for the data and suggest directions for future research.
The Secret Life Of The Political Question Doctrine, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441 (2004), Louis Michael Seidman
The Secret Life Of The Political Question Doctrine, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441 (2004), Louis Michael Seidman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
Judicial Independence In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Defining Democracy: The Supreme Court's Campaign Finance Dilemma, Lori A. Ringhand
Defining Democracy: The Supreme Court's Campaign Finance Dilemma, Lori A. Ringhand
Scholarly Works
On December 10, 2003 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in McConnell v. FEC. In McConnell, the Court was asked to determine the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA"). A divided Court, in a deeply fractured decision in which six justices wrote individual opinions, upheld the major provisions of the legislation. Yet despite the almost 300 pages of reasoning provided by the Court, and a voluminous record developed by the district court, the Justices could not agree on what purportedly is the central issue in campaign finance law: whether the challenged regulations were necessary …
The Most Rational Branch: Guinn V. Legislature And The Judiciary's Role As Helpful Arbiter Of Conflict, Jeffrey W. Stempel
The Most Rational Branch: Guinn V. Legislature And The Judiciary's Role As Helpful Arbiter Of Conflict, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
When the Nevada Supreme Court decided Guinn v. Legislature, one would have thought from reading the popular press accounts that the court had forcibly displaced the State legislature by means of a violent coup d'etat. Newspaper accounts of the decision referred to it as a usurpation of power in violation of clear constitutional language, belittling the court in language sometimes more appropriate to the baseball bleachers than to serious editorial commentary. Following suit, politicized elements of the citizenry began a recall effort (seemingly unsuccessful as of this writing) directed at the court as well as joining the chorus of criticisms. …
The Judicial Appointment Power Of The Chief Justice, Theodore Ruger
The Judicial Appointment Power Of The Chief Justice, Theodore Ruger
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Historical Overview Of The Judicial Selection Process In The United States: Is The Electoral System In Pennsylvania Unjustified, Sandra Schultz Newman, Daniel Mark Isaacs
Historical Overview Of The Judicial Selection Process In The United States: Is The Electoral System In Pennsylvania Unjustified, Sandra Schultz Newman, Daniel Mark Isaacs
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Thirteenth Amendment Framework For Combating Racial Profiling, William M. Carter Jr.
A Thirteenth Amendment Framework For Combating Racial Profiling, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
Law enforcement officers’ use of race to single persons out for criminal suspicion (“racial profiling”) is the subject of much scrutiny and debate. This Article provides a new understanding of racial profiling. While scholars have correctly concluded that racial profiling should be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and existing federal statutes, this Article contends that the use of race as a proxy for criminality is also a badge and incident of slavery in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.
Racial profiling is not only a denial of the right to equal treatment, but …
"A Question Which Convulses A Nation": The Early Republic's Greatest Debate About The Judicial Review Power, Theodore Ruger
"A Question Which Convulses A Nation": The Early Republic's Greatest Debate About The Judicial Review Power, Theodore Ruger
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Pace And Cause Of Change, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2004), Larry D. Kramer
The Pace And Cause Of Change, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2004), Larry D. Kramer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.