Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Adjudication (1)
- Analogical reasoning (1)
- Coherence theories (1)
- Coherence theory (1)
- Conflict (1)
-
- Consistency (1)
- Constraint (1)
- Court (1)
- Cover ups (1)
- Critique (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Decisions (1)
- Deductive reasoning (1)
- Dicta (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Doctrinal reasons (1)
- Doctrine of precedent (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Experience of discontinuity (1)
- Explanatory reasons (1)
- External (1)
- Freely willed (1)
- Holding (1)
- Institutional critique (1)
- Internal (1)
- Intuition thesis (1)
- Intuitive judgments (1)
- Jeffrey Malkan (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judging process (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Michigan Law Review
Judge Harry T. Edwards has written a lucid and seemingly logical plea for the judiciary to be granted exclusive self-regulation over all matters of judicial misconduct that fall short of crimes or impeachable offenses. His essay demonstrates the seriousness with which he regards misconduct that would bring shame to the federal judiciary. He believes that the judiciary as a whole is the best institution to ascertain and take measures against individual aberrant judges who are guilty of various forms of misconduct, and I have no doubt of the sincerity of his belief. Yet when we look at claims for self-regulation …
Retrospective Justification, Jeffrey Malkan
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.