Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Judges Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Judges

Letter From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Questions To Ask Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison Jun 1986

Letter From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Questions To Ask Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.


Memo From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison Jun 1986

Memo From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.


Raul Memorandum Regarding Antonin Scalia, Alan Charles Raul Jun 1986

Raul Memorandum Regarding Antonin Scalia, Alan Charles Raul

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.


The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly Jan 1986

The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Biographical Information Regarding Anthony Kennedy From White House Supreme Court Nominee Binder, Anonymous Jan 1986

Biographical Information Regarding Anthony Kennedy From White House Supreme Court Nominee Binder, Anonymous

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.


Memorandum Regarding Robert Bork As A Possible Supreme Court Nominee [1986], Anonymous Jan 1986

Memorandum Regarding Robert Bork As A Possible Supreme Court Nominee [1986], Anonymous

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.


Comment On Professor Van Alstyne's Paper, Henry P. Monaghan Jan 1986

Comment On Professor Van Alstyne's Paper, Henry P. Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

My major difficulty with Professor Van Alstyne's paper is its incomplete character. In the end, he makes only two points: first, judges are authorized to apply "this Constitution," not to do justice; and second, judges should not lie about what they are doing. The danger is that after a while the first point sounds somewhat empty, while the actual content of the second point seems entirely parasitic on the first.