Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Appraisal (1)
- Court of Appeals (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Evidence admissibility (1)
-
- Federal Trade Commission v. Gratz (1)
- Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner (1)
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Jury of inquest (1)
- Michigan Constitutional Convention of 1850 (1)
- Michigan Supreme Court (1)
- Michigan condemnation jury proceeding (1)
- Private property (1)
- Public interest (1)
- Scope of order (1)
- Special tribunal (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The relationship of judge to jury in Michigan condemnation proceedings presents in many ways a merger of some of the problems and questions contained in the relationship of judge to jury in civil trials, and of court to tribunal in administrative law. Theorists as well as the practicing lawyer in Michigan and some other states" may well find in the development of the Michigan condemnation proceeding an interesting example of the growth of a procedure for adjudication, in a context of cross-fire between legislative ideas and judicial interpretation of a constitutional provision.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Appellate Review Of Federal Trade Commission Proceedings, David A. Nelson S. Ed.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Appellate Review Of Federal Trade Commission Proceedings, David A. Nelson S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
During its forty-five year life the Federal Trade Commission has gone through some difficult periods to emerge today as one of the fundamental instrumentalities of government in the regulation of business. Its vast powers and influence, well known to lawyers, will not be explored here. Rather, the purpose of this comment is to appraise the extent of control which the judiciary now exercises over the commission in its adjudicative functions, so as to offer some indication to the practitioner of the probabilities regarding the outcome of judicial review on an appeal beyond the full commission. The approach to be used …