Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- England (2)
- History (2)
- Juries (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly (1)
-
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Bushel's Case (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Context (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Decision making (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- Facts (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Findings of fact (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Generalism (1)
- Hurtado v. California (1)
- Incrementalism (1)
- Independence (1)
- Institutional realism (1)
- Jones v. Robbins (1)
- Judicial decision-making (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Judicial virtues (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Lights Hidden Under Bushel's Case, Thomas A. Green
Lights Hidden Under Bushel's Case, Thomas A. Green
Book Chapters
Some forty years ago, Charlie Donahue created a course which he titled "Law, Morals and Society." Designed for undergraduates, and situated among the offerings of the University of Michigan's interdisciplinary Medieval and Renaissance Collegium, the course reflected the approach to doing history that, as this volume recognizes, Charlie has followed throughout his long and enormously influential career as scholar, teacher, lecturer, and inepressible master of well-timed interventions during conference-panel discussion periods. "LMS" was composed of four units. Charlie, who taught two of them, led off with the legal basis for the deposition of Richard II; I followed with the law …
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Although commentators frequently debate how judges should decide antitrust cases substantively, little attention has been paid to theories of judicial virtue in antitrust decision making. This essay considers four pairings of virtues: (1) striving for substantive purity versus conceding to institutional realism; (2) incrementalism versus generalism; (3) presenting a unified face versus candidly conceding differences among judges on an appellate panel; and (4) adhering strictly to stare decisis versus freely updating precedents to reflect evolving economic learning or conditions. While recognizing the complexities that sometimes pull judges in the opposite direction, this Article gives the nod to institutional realism, incrementalism, …
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
When I was first introduced to the constitutional regulation of criminal procedure in the mid-1950s, a single issue dominated the field: To what extent did the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment impose upon states the same constitutional restraints that the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments imposed upon the federal government? While those Bill of Rights provisions, as even then construed, imposed a broad range of constitutional restraints upon the federal criminal justice system, the federal system was (and still is) minuscule as compared to the combined systems of the fifty states. With the Bill of Rights provisions …