Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- After the bench (7)
- Judicial retirement (7)
- Appellate court (4)
- Judge (3)
- Judges (3)
-
- Appellate (2)
- Federal court of appeals (2)
- Judicial workload (2)
- Legal profession (2)
- Oral argument (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Workload (2)
- Alito (1)
- Alternatives (1)
- Answer (1)
- Answering (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate advocacy (1)
- Appellate court cohesiveness (1)
- Appellate decsionmaking (1)
- Appellate ethics (1)
- Appellate judge advocacy preference (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Appellate lawyers (1)
- Ashton v. Kentucky (1)
- Blackmun (1)
- Borrowing language (1)
- Brief writing (1)
- Burger (1)
- Canadian courts (1)
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Judges
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Deciding Not To Decide: A Limited Defense Of The Silent Concurrence, Alexander I. Platt
Deciding Not To Decide: A Limited Defense Of The Silent Concurrence, Alexander I. Platt
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
All Copying Is Not Created Equal: Borrowed Language In Supreme Court Opinions, Adam Feldman
All Copying Is Not Created Equal: Borrowed Language In Supreme Court Opinions, Adam Feldman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Practical Guide To Appellate Judging, J. E. Cote
A Practical Guide To Appellate Judging, J. E. Cote
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
To Lobby Or Not To Lobby: That Is An Important Question, Kermit V. Lipez
To Lobby Or Not To Lobby: That Is An Important Question, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Preface, D. P. Marshall Jr.
Preface, D. P. Marshall Jr.
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
All Right, Retired Judges, Write!, Ruggero J. Aldisert
All Right, Retired Judges, Write!, Ruggero J. Aldisert
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Transitioning, Frank M. Coffin
Transitioning, Frank M. Coffin
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
One Judge's Journey, Janine P. Geske
One Judge's Journey, Janine P. Geske
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Stepping Down, D. Brock Hornby
Stepping Down, D. Brock Hornby
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Firm Foundation For Life After The Bench, Vincent L. Mckusick
A Firm Foundation For Life After The Bench, Vincent L. Mckusick
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Retired And Working, Roger Philip Kerans
Retired And Working, Roger Philip Kerans
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Incivility And Unprofessionalism On Appeal: Impugning The Integrity Of Judges, Steven Wisotsky
Incivility And Unprofessionalism On Appeal: Impugning The Integrity Of Judges, Steven Wisotsky
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
What's The Difference? Comparing The Advocacy Preferences Of State And Federal Appellate Judges, David Lewis
What's The Difference? Comparing The Advocacy Preferences Of State And Federal Appellate Judges, David Lewis
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Judicial Secretary's Many Roles: Working With An Appellate Judge And Clerks, Stephen L. Wasby
A Judicial Secretary's Many Roles: Working With An Appellate Judge And Clerks, Stephen L. Wasby
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
My First Appellate Argument: It Can Only Get Better, Jon O. Newman
My First Appellate Argument: It Can Only Get Better, Jon O. Newman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Advice From Justice Jackson, D. P. Marshall Jr.
Advice From Justice Jackson, D. P. Marshall Jr.
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
A case is made for increasing the number of federal judges. The author uses the loss of judge involvement in decisionmaking to begin his argument. The discussion then addresses the arguments against increasing federal judgeships.