Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American law (1)
- Appellate court (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Court rules (1)
-
- Defenses (1)
- Due process (1)
- En banc rehearing (1)
- Federal court (1)
- Federal rules of appellate procedure (1)
- Floyd v. city of n.y. (1)
- Function of rehearing petition (1)
- Gorilla rule (1)
- Historical (1)
- Judge scheindlin (1)
- Ligon v. city of N.Y. (1)
- Nostra sponte (1)
- Panel rehearing (1)
- Problems (1)
- Procedural due process (1)
- Protection (1)
- Recourse (1)
- Reform (1)
- Rule 21 (1)
- Scheindlin (1)
- State court (1)
- Sua sponte (1)
- Supreme court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Petitions for en banc rehearings are rarely granted. A Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit provides a history and reasoning of the rehearing process and his personal observations on those petitions and processes in today's court.