Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- SEC (8)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (8)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Administrative Law Judges (4)
-
- Article II (4)
- ALJ (3)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Administrative Procedure Act (3)
- Inferior officers (3)
- Morrison (3)
- Olson (3)
- Politics (3)
- APA (2)
- Administrative Law Judge (2)
- Article III (2)
- Article III Judge (2)
- Bandimere (2)
- Bebo (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Contents (2)
- Dodd-Frank Act (2)
- Editorial board (2)
- Ex parte Hennen (2)
- Examiners (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Fee Enterprise Fund (2)
- Freytag (2)
- Impeachment (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Sec Disgorgement Actions: Equitable Remedy Or Penalty?, Armando Lopez
Sec Disgorgement Actions: Equitable Remedy Or Penalty?, Armando Lopez
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Mining For Children’S Data In Today’S Digital World, Damin Park
Mining For Children’S Data In Today’S Digital World, Damin Park
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Keeping The Healthcare Industry Accountable, Yoori Chung
Keeping The Healthcare Industry Accountable, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Sg’S Brief In Lucia Could Portend The End Of The Alj Program As We Have Known It, Jeffrey S. Lubbers
Sg’S Brief In Lucia Could Portend The End Of The Alj Program As We Have Known It, Jeffrey S. Lubbers
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Opinion Of The Court, Elena Kagan
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Opinion Of The Court, Elena Kagan
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Neither Party, Richard J. Pierce Jr.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Neither Party, Richard J. Pierce Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Of Amicus Curiae The Forum Of United States Administrative Law Judges In Support Of Neither Party, Gerald Marvin Bober
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Of Amicus Curiae The Forum Of United States Administrative Law Judges In Support Of Neither Party, Gerald Marvin Bober
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference In Support Of Neither Party, John M. Vittone
Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission: Brief Amicus Curiae Of Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference In Support Of Neither Party, John M. Vittone
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission, Selina Malherbe
Introduction To Lucia Et Al. V. Securities And Exchange Commission, Selina Malherbe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Liberty And Separation Of Powers In Judicial Review Of Privatized Governance Regimes, Jeffrey Kleeger
Liberty And Separation Of Powers In Judicial Review Of Privatized Governance Regimes, Jeffrey Kleeger
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This article examines the power difference between homeowner association (HOA) owners, members, and their governing boards. Administrative adjudication can remedy the imbalance to better secure member rights. What is necessary is a heightened standard of judicial review and a requirement to produce a comprehensive record for review. Boards enjoy an advantage in disputes with members—courts uphold board actions unless they are arbitrary and capricious. Boards also possess largely unrestricted state-delegated authority to make and enforce rules, as well as decide penalties for infractions. These clearly governmental functions are not restrained by the state action doctrine. Tools of administrative adjudication are …
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others, Edwin L. Felter Jr., Oyku Didem Aydin
The Death Of Judicial Independence In Turkey: A Lesson For Others, Edwin L. Felter Jr., Oyku Didem Aydin
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
State Laws For Due Process Hearings Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Perry A. Zirkel
State Laws For Due Process Hearings Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Perry A. Zirkel
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Dedication To The Honorable Larry Jay Craddock, Julian Mann Iii, Selina Malherbe
Dedication To The Honorable Larry Jay Craddock, Julian Mann Iii, Selina Malherbe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Hearing The States, Anthony Johnstone
Hearing The States, Anthony Johnstone
Pepperdine Law Review
The 2016 Presidential and Senate elections raise the possibility that a conservative, life-tenured Supreme Court will preside for years over a politically dynamic majority. This threatens to weaken the public’s already fragile confidence in the Court. By lowering the political stakes of both national elections and its own decisions, federalism may enable the Court to defuse some of the most explosive controversies it hears. Federalism offers a second-best solution, even if neither conservatives nor liberals can impose a national political agenda. However, principled federalism arguments are tricky. They are structural, more prudential than legal or empirical. Regardless of ideology, a …
Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal To Improve The United States Supreme Court, Eric J. Segall
Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal To Improve The United States Supreme Court, Eric J. Segall
Pepperdine Law Review
Over the last twenty-five years, some of the most significant Supreme Court decisions involving issues of national significance like abortion, affirmative action, and voting rights were five-to-four decisions. In February 2016, the death of Justice Antonin Scalia turned the nine-Justice court into an eight-Justice court, comprised of four liberal and four conservative Justices, for the first time in our nation’s history. This article proposes that an evenly divided court consisting of eight Justices is the ideal Supreme Court composition. Although the other two branches of government have evolved over the years, the Supreme Court has undergone virtually no significant changes. …
Justice As Fair Division, Ian Bartrum, Kathryn Nyman, Peter Otto
Justice As Fair Division, Ian Bartrum, Kathryn Nyman, Peter Otto
Pepperdine Law Review
The current hyperpoliticization of the Court grows out of a feedback loop between politicized appointments and politicized decision-making. This Article suggests a change in the internal procedures by which the Court hears and decides particular cases. A three-Justice panel hears and decides each case. Appeal to an en banc sitting of the entire Court would require a unanimous vote of all non-recused Justices. This Article explores several possible approaches in selecting the three-Justice panel. This Article proposes that applying a fair division scheme to the Court’s decision-making process might act to reverse this loop and work to depoliticize the Court …
How The Prohibition On "Under-Ruling" Distorts The Judicial Function (And What To Do About It), A. Christopher Bryant, Kimberly Breedon
How The Prohibition On "Under-Ruling" Distorts The Judicial Function (And What To Do About It), A. Christopher Bryant, Kimberly Breedon
Pepperdine Law Review
Lower courts face a dilemma when forced to choose between older Supreme Court precedent that directly controls the present legal dispute and an intervening Supreme Court ruling that relies on rationale which erodes or undermines the rationale of the direct precedent. Nearly thirty years ago, the Supreme Court announced a rule requiring lower courts to follow the older precedent and disregard any inconsistency resulting from intervening rulings, effectively barring lower courts from “under-ruling” the older Supreme Court precedent. This prohibition on “under-ruling,” here referred to as the “Agostini Rule,” reflects a departure from the core rule-of-law values requiring similar cases …
What Are The Judiciary’S Politics?, Michael W. Mcconnell
What Are The Judiciary’S Politics?, Michael W. Mcconnell
Pepperdine Law Review
What are the politics of the federal judiciary, to the extent that the federal judiciary has politics? Whose interests do federal judges represent? This Essay puts forward five different kinds of politics that characterize the federal judiciary. First, the federal judiciary represents the educated elite. Second, the federal judiciary represents past political majorities. Third, the federal judiciary is more politically balanced than the legislative or executive branches. Fourth, the federal judiciary is organized by regions, and between those regions there is significant diversity. Fifth, to the extent that the judiciary leans one way or the other, it leans toward the …
Nothing New Under The Sun: The Law-Politics Dynamic In Supreme Court Decision Making, Stephen M. Feldman
Nothing New Under The Sun: The Law-Politics Dynamic In Supreme Court Decision Making, Stephen M. Feldman
Pepperdine Law Review
Recent events have seemed to inject politics into American judicial institutions. As a result, many observers worry that the Supreme Court, in particular, has become politicized. According to this view, the Justices should decide cases in accordance with the rule of law and be unmoved by political concerns. These worries arise from a mistaken assumption: that law and politics can be separate and independent in the process of judicial decision making. But at the Supreme Court (as well as in the lower courts, for that matter), decision making arises from a law-politics dynamic. Adjudication in accord with a pure rule …
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Michelle Wellnitz
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Humphrey’S Executor Squared: Free Enterprise Fund V. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board And Its Implications For Administrative Law Judges, Robert S. Garrison Jr.
Humphrey’S Executor Squared: Free Enterprise Fund V. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board And Its Implications For Administrative Law Judges, Robert S. Garrison Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.