Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Economics (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Growth and Development (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Institution
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Recent Private International Law Developments Before The Supreme Court Of Canada, Antonin I. Pribetic
Recent Private International Law Developments Before The Supreme Court Of Canada, Antonin I. Pribetic
Antonin I. Pribetic
A trilogy of interesting cases involving private international law recently wended their way to the Supreme Court of Canada: (1) King v. Drabinsky (an Ontario case addressing the applicability of the Charter in respect of the enforcement of a foreign judgment); (2) Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Lloyd's Underwriters (a British Columbia case involving declaratory relief in the context of parallel proceedings and forum non conveniens); and (3) Yugraneft v. Rexx Management Corporation (an Alberta case which affirmed that the two-year limitation period under s.3 of Alberta's Limitations Act, governs when a party seeks the recognition and enforcement in Alberta …
Ripe Standing Vines And The Jurisprudential Tasting Of Matured Legal Wines – And Law & Bananas: Property And Public Choice In The Permitting Process, Donald J. Kochan
Ripe Standing Vines And The Jurisprudential Tasting Of Matured Legal Wines – And Law & Bananas: Property And Public Choice In The Permitting Process, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
From produce to wine, we only consume things when they are ready. The courts are no different. That concept of “readiness” is how courts address cases and controversies as well. Justiciability doctrines, particularly ripeness, have a particularly important role in takings challenges to permitting decisions. The courts largely hold that a single permit denial does not give them enough information to evaluate whether the denial is in violation of law. As a result of this jurisprudential reality, regulators with discretion have an incentive to use their power to extract rents from those that need their permission. Non-justiciability of permit denials …