Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 42 U.S.C. (1)
- Administrative Searches for Evidence of Crime: The Impact of New York v. Burger (1)
- Admission requirements (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate practices (1)
-
- Arbitration (1)
- Camara (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1866 (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1871 (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Civil Rights in Transition: Sections 1981 and 1982 Cover Discrimination on the Basis of Ancestry and Ethnicity (1)
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States (1)
- Commercial property (1)
- Committee on Federal Courts of the New York State Bar Association (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal code (1)
- Criminal liability (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Denied tenure (1)
- Depositions (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Diversity jurisdiction (1)
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
- Eleventh amendment (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Federal practioner (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Intentional discrimination (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legality And Discretion In The Distribution Of Criminal Sanctions, Paul H. Robinson
Legality And Discretion In The Distribution Of Criminal Sanctions, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
The judicial system now responds to criminal conduct in two rather divergent steps. A judge or jury first determines if a defendant should be held liable for a criminal offense. If so, then the judge or jury goes on to choose a penalty. Precise rules, designed to ensure fairness and predictability, govern the first stage, liability assignment. In the second stage, sentencing, however, judges and juries exercise broad discretion in meting out sanctions. In this Article, Professor Robinson argues that both liability assignment and sentencing are part of a single process of punishing criminal behavior and should be made more …