Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Courts (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Communication (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Early Childhood Education (1)
- Education (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Organization Development (1)
- Other Communication (1)
- Other Education (1)
- Other Rhetoric and Composition (1)
- Other Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Prison Education and Reentry (1)
- Rhetoric (1)
- Rhetoric and Composition (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Parental Incarceration And The Costly Effects On Their Children, Briana Rae Zocher
Parental Incarceration And The Costly Effects On Their Children, Briana Rae Zocher
Master of Arts in Criminal Justice Leadership
The purpose of this project is to bring awareness to the silent victims associated with parental incarceration – their children. Throughout this project, the focus will be aimed towards promoting the education of the effects of parental incarceration and the impact it has on their children in a variety of compacities and how those settings influence incarceration amongst children of incarcerated parents. In addition, this paper will discuss parental incarceration in three different lens views: administrative, ethical, and legal. First, the administrative lens pertaining to leadership and evolution to successful leadership, especially the critical component of crisis communication strategy. Second, …
Legal Interpretation, Mykaila Ashlynn Berry
Legal Interpretation, Mykaila Ashlynn Berry
Undergraduate Theses, Professional Papers, and Capstone Artifacts
The purpose of this project is to provide a fresh and in-depth analysis of legal jurisprudence through the use of two of the most important legal theorists of our time, H. L. A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin. This project focuses on how Dworkin’s position in his famous paper “Hard Cases”, helps us understand an important Supreme Court case, Cohen v. California. Cohen will be the main focus of my project. The project will discuss the case and the possible ways of deciding the case. Then the project explains both Dworkin’s and Hart’s positions. Finally, the project will analyze how Dworkin’s …
Opinions In Context: An Exploration Of The Rhetoric Used By Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia And Ruth Bader Ginsburg Regarding The Separation Of Church And State, Catherine Evans
Senior Honors Projects, 2010-2019
Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg represented opposite ends of the political spectrum on the Court, having been appointed by presidents from different parties. Their opinions on cases revolving around the interpretation of separation of church and state do/did not occur within a vacuum, and this paper examines both the context surrounding these opinions and rhetoric of the opinions themselves, closing with a discussion of the former’s effect on the latter. Specifically, four cases (two for each) from the beginning and end of the justices’ careers will be analyzed: Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette …