Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antioch Law Journal (1)
- Closing Argument (1)
- Dissents (1)
- Eleventh Circuit (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
-
- Gender Equity (1)
- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1)
- Miranda Warnings (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Oregon v. Elstad (1)
- Prosecutorial Misconduct (1)
- Reproductive Rights (1)
- State Court Judges (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Tucker v. Kemp (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Women's Rights (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Justice Ginsburg's Journey To Dissents And Influence On Reproductive Rights, Songo Wawa
Justice Ginsburg's Journey To Dissents And Influence On Reproductive Rights, Songo Wawa
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s advocacy for gender equity, evidenced by her nationally famous dissents, began long before her 27 years on the Supreme Court. Prior to becoming a Supreme Court Justice, Attorney Ginsburg’s early experiences of gender inequity led to her advocacy for women’s rights as a law professor and as co-founder of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project. 1 Attorney Ginsburg’s legal strategy encompassed her pragmatic approach to voicing her opinions about gender equality. 2 In Gonzales v. Carhart, both her dissent announcement and written dissent demonstrated Justice Ginsburg’s commitment to women’s reproductive autonomy.3 Without Justice Ginsburg’s …
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Imagine an average young man on the threshold of adulthood, living in a medium-sized town in a middle-class family. Still in his early years, he gets into a little local trouble and one day finds the police at his door. They ask him questions about a burglary. He panics, and as he racks his brain for some scrap of legal knowledge that might get him out of this frightening situation, he admits that he knows about the crime, stating he was there. The police become more persistent, telling him they know about his involvement, asking him if he wants to …
Between Skylla And Charybdis: The Eleventh Circuit Rushes Toward Disaster In Tucker V. Kemp, Marshall Dayan
Between Skylla And Charybdis: The Eleventh Circuit Rushes Toward Disaster In Tucker V. Kemp, Marshall Dayan
Antioch Law Journal
In January 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided the case of Hance v. Zant. Establishing a stringent standard apparently in line with the Supreme Court's requirement of heightened reliability in capital cases, the Eleventh Circuit reversed Hance's death sentence. The court held, inter alia, that the prosecutor's inflammatory closing argument at the end of the sentencing phase of the trial was violative of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Six months later, in a group of four other death penalty cases, the United States Supreme Court dismissed challenges to the sentencing process.2 The Court held …