Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judges (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Law and Society (2)
-
- Bias (1)
- Case management (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Complex. litigation (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Costs (1)
- Court costs (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Expression (1)
- Fees (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fines (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- General Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- In-group bias (1)
- Indigent (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
Comentario Al Reglamento Sobre El Sistema De Resolución De Controversias En Materia De Consumo, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comentario Al Reglamento Sobre El Sistema De Resolución De Controversias En Materia De Consumo, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comentario crítico del decreto 202/2015 (Argentina) que reglamenta el Sistema de resolucion de controversias en materia de consumo. Se critica la falta de mecanismos para la ejecución de acuerdos conciliatorios y resoluciones administrativas que reconocen derecho a los consumidores.
Free Expression, In-Group Bias, And The Court's Conservatives: A Critique Of The Epstein-Parker-Segal Study, Todd E. Pettys
Free Expression, In-Group Bias, And The Court's Conservatives: A Critique Of The Epstein-Parker-Segal Study, Todd E. Pettys
Todd E. Pettys
In a recent, widely publicized study, a prestigious team of political scientists concluded that there is strong evidence of ideological in-group bias among the Supreme Court’s members in First Amendment free-expression cases, with the current four most conservative justices being the Roberts Court’s worst offenders. Beneath the surface of the authors’ conclusions, however, one finds a surprisingly sizable combination of coding errors, superficial case readings, and questionable judgments about litigants’ ideological affiliations. Many of those problems likely flow either from shortcomings that reportedly afflict the Supreme Court Database (the data set that nearly always provides the starting point for empirical …
Complexity In Litigation: A Differential Diagnosis, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Complexity In Litigation: A Differential Diagnosis, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
This note examines complex litigation with the goal of providing practical options for its management. It is written from a judge’s perspective. I review the definition of a “complex” case and explain its emphasis on the need for a judge to manage the case, with a focus on enabling settlement. I address a series of specific characteristics or aspects of complex cases, explaining how these affect the progress of the case. Then the note explores the many tools and techniques judges have to manage and ameliorate difficult aspects of complex cases. {Pre-print. Final article as published differs substantially and is …