Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Masters in chancery (3)
- Recusal (3)
- Complex litigation (2)
- Judicial accountability (2)
- Judicial independence (2)
-
- ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (1)
- Activist judges (1)
- Anastasoff v. United States (1)
- Appearance of impropriety (1)
- Appearance standard (1)
- Appellate ethics (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Appellate lawyers (1)
- Criticism of judges (1)
- Curtailment of alternatives to traditional appellate decisionmaking (1)
- Divided court (1)
- Earl Warren (1)
- Extra-judicial speech (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial disciplinary standards (1)
- Judicial impropriety (1)
- Judicial intimidation (1)
- Judicial self-restraint (1)
- Legal case management (1)
- Richard Sheppard Arnold (1)
- Supreme Court recusal (1)
- Thompson v. Reuting (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Incivility And Unprofessionalism On Appeal: Impugning The Integrity Of Judges, Steven Wisotsky
Incivility And Unprofessionalism On Appeal: Impugning The Integrity Of Judges, Steven Wisotsky
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence And Accountability Meet Extra-Judicial Speech And The First Amendment: An Uneasy Co-Existence, Honorable Wendell L. Griffen
Judicial Independence And Accountability Meet Extra-Judicial Speech And The First Amendment: An Uneasy Co-Existence, Honorable Wendell L. Griffen
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Earl Warren To Wendell Griffen: A Study Of Judicial Intimidation And Judicial Self-Restraint, Honorable Robert L. Brown
From Earl Warren To Wendell Griffen: A Study Of Judicial Intimidation And Judicial Self-Restraint, Honorable Robert L. Brown
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Accountability To The Past, Present, And Future: Precedent, Politics And Power, Stephen B. Burbank
Judicial Accountability To The Past, Present, And Future: Precedent, Politics And Power, Stephen B. Burbank
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding The Appearance Of Impropriety: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility, Cynthia Gray
Avoiding The Appearance Of Impropriety: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility, Cynthia Gray
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preface, Ray Thornton
Preface, Ray Thornton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Don't Shoot The Canons: Maintaining The Appearance Of Propriety Standard, M. Margaret Mckeown
Don't Shoot The Canons: Maintaining The Appearance Of Propriety Standard, M. Margaret Mckeown
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Recusals And The "Problem" Of An Equally Divided Supreme Court, Ryan Black, Lee Epstein
Recusals And The "Problem" Of An Equally Divided Supreme Court, Ryan Black, Lee Epstein
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judge Arnold's Four Rules: A Model For A Life In The Law, Sean Unger
Judge Arnold's Four Rules: A Model For A Life In The Law, Sean Unger
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Court Special Masters: A Vital Resource In The Era Of Complex Litigation, Mark A. Fellows, Roger S. Haydock
Federal Court Special Masters: A Vital Resource In The Era Of Complex Litigation, Mark A. Fellows, Roger S. Haydock
William Mitchell Law Review
This article is dedicated to all those who have served as special masters in federal court. After serving as a judicial master, it is easy to believe in the importance of the role in our grand system of justice. After reading this article, we hope it will be clear how vital masters are to everyone receiving fair, just, and expedient civil justice.
Special Masters In State Court Complex Litigation: An Available And Underused Case Management Tool, Lynn Jokela, David F. Herr
Special Masters In State Court Complex Litigation: An Available And Underused Case Management Tool, Lynn Jokela, David F. Herr
William Mitchell Law Review
This article examines the role masters have played in litigation and explores the benefits that might be obtained from the greater use of masters in the future. The FJC survey of federal judges appointing special masters concluded that special masters were “extremely or very effective.” The FJC study is an empirical survey of the effectiveness of special masters, and it includes commentary from judges regarding their experience after appointing special masters. These benefits include better, faster, and fairer resolution of litigation in the cases in which masters are used, as well as an easing of the burdens these cases place …
2004 Special Masters Conference: Transcript Of Proceedings, Various Special Masters
2004 Special Masters Conference: Transcript Of Proceedings, Various Special Masters
William Mitchell Law Review
A historic gathering of special masters occurred on October 15th and 16th, 2004 in Saint Paul, Minnesota. Federal and state court-appointed masters from around the country met for the first time to share their experiences as special masters and to form a national association of court appointed masters. This issue of the William Mitchell Law Review contains articles presented at the conference and the transcript of faculty presentations. Throughout the transcript of faculty presentations, the word “speaker” denotes a conference attendee.