Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Asylum (1)
- Bexar County (1)
- Bexar County Court (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bias blind spot (1)
-
- Border crisis (1)
- Border patrol (1)
- Border policy (1)
- CBP (1)
- CDC (1)
- COMPAS (1)
- Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. (1)
- Catch-all rule (1)
- Centers for Disease Control (1)
- Cesare Beccaria (1)
- Chief Justice Castille (1)
- Condemnation (1)
- Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (1)
- Court-appointed attorney (1)
- Criminal defense attorney (1)
- Criminal sentencing (1)
- Customs and Border Protection (1)
- DHS (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Detention center (1)
- Deter (1)
- Deter crime (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Deterrent (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
It Is Time To Get Back To Basics On The Border, Donna Coltharp
It Is Time To Get Back To Basics On The Border, Donna Coltharp
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Lessons Learned, Lessons Offered: Creating A Domestic Violence Drug Court, Judge Rosie Speedlin Gonzalez, Dr. Stacy Speedlin Gonzalez
Lessons Learned, Lessons Offered: Creating A Domestic Violence Drug Court, Judge Rosie Speedlin Gonzalez, Dr. Stacy Speedlin Gonzalez
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Deterrence, David Crump
Reforming Recusal Rules: Reassessing The Presumption Of Judicial Impartiality In Light Of The Realities Of Judging And Changing The Substance Of Disqualification Standards To Eliminate Cognitive Errors, Melinda A. Marbes
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In each instance there has been an outcry when a presiding jurist was asked to recuse but declined. Unfortunately, even if the jurist explains his refusal to recuse, the reasons given often are unsatisfying and do little to quell suspicions of bias. Instead, litigants, the press, and the public question whether the jurist actually is unbiased and doubt the impartiality of the judiciary as a whole. This negative reaction to refusals to recuse is caused, at least in part, by politically charged circumstances that cause further …