Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- All (1)
- American State Department (1)
- American lawyers (1)
- Any (1)
- Arbitrary and partisan decisions (1)
-
- Article 1 of the UN Charter (1)
- Cardozo (1)
- Cass sunstein (1)
- Community values (1)
- Conflict of international laws (1)
- Conflicting policies and principles (1)
- David Johnson (1)
- De Tocqueville (1)
- Definition (1)
- Dismemberment of existing states (1)
- E.H. Carr (1)
- Eli Lauterpacht (1)
- English solicitors (1)
- Ethical systems (1)
- Express (1)
- Extra-legal standards (1)
- Extravagant (1)
- Fiorello La Guardia (1)
- Genocide (1)
- Inference (1)
- Integrity (1)
- International lawyers (1)
- International legal process (1)
- International legal profession (1)
- Interpretation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
The Problem Of Extravagant Inferences, Cass Sunstein
The Problem Of Extravagant Inferences, Cass Sunstein
Georgia Law Review
Judges and lawyers sometimes act as if a constitutional or statutory term must, as a matter of semantics, be understood to have a particular meaning, when it could easily be understood to have another meaning, or several other meanings. When judges and lawyers act as if a legal term has a unique semantic meaning, even though it does not, they should be seen to be drawing extravagant inferences. Some constitutional provisions are treated this way; consider the idea that the vesting of executive power in a President of the United States necessarily includes the power to remove, at will, a …
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.