Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 23(b)(3) (1)
- ADR (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust Class Actions (1)
- Antitrust injury (1)
-
- Antitrust standing (1)
- Appellate litigation (1)
- Attitudinal model (1)
- CERCLA (1)
- Certification motion (1)
- Chinese Political and Judicial System (1)
- Class action (1)
- Constitución Nacional (1)
- Economics (1)
- Elecciones (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fraude (1)
- La calidad electoral (1)
- Law (Empirical) (1)
- Law and Anthropology (1)
- Legal model (1)
- Maniobras (1)
- Manipulación opinión pública (1)
- Medical Malpractice (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- New legal realism (1)
- Pureza del sufragio (1)
- Represión legal (1)
- Settlements (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Judges
El Fraude Político En La Argentina, Horacio M. Lynch
El Fraude Político En La Argentina, Horacio M. Lynch
Horacio M. LYNCH
Ensayo que indaga el concepto del “fraude electoral o político” buscando la acepción correcta del término y de sus maniobras conexas, y eventualmente cómo pueden denominarse las actividades enderezadas a manipular la opinión pública para influir en el resultado de las elecciones entorpeciendo el libre ejercicio del sufragio (¿delitos contra la Constitución?) y eventualmente cómo pueden prevenirse y sancionarse. En la Ia. Parte se indaga (a) en su acepción amplia, sobre el fraude electoral en la Argentina a lo largo de un siglo: sus prácticas iniciales y como ha ido evolucionando y sofisticando; (b) en qué medida maniobras de manipulación …
The Rationality Aspect Of The Case Referrals System: Thoughts On The Supreme People’S Court Practices（案件请示制度合理的一面_从最高人民法院角度展开的思考）, Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Judicial Application Of Village Rules(村规民约的司法适用), Meng Hou
Judicial Application Of Village Rules(村规民约的司法适用), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Judging Cercla: An Empirical Analysis Of Circuit Court Decision-Making, Clifford Chad Henson
Judging Cercla: An Empirical Analysis Of Circuit Court Decision-Making, Clifford Chad Henson
Clifford Chad Henson
Abstract: Political scientists, and increasingly legal scholars, have become skeptical of judges’ attempts to explain decisions based exclusively on applying fact to law, and have attempted to identify factors that influence judicial decision-making. This study isolates a set of cases dealing with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and identifies variable sets corresponding to factors one would expect to be significant under competing models of judicial decision-making. While both the legal and extra-legal model independently explain some judicial decision-making, the legal model has more explanatory power and adds significantly to the explanatory power of the extra-legal …
Striking An Efficient Balance: Making Sense Of Antitrust Standing In Class Action Certification Motions, Kelly J. Bozanic
Striking An Efficient Balance: Making Sense Of Antitrust Standing In Class Action Certification Motions, Kelly J. Bozanic
Kelly J. Bozanic
Class actions are powerful litigation devices, especially in antitrust cases. Plaintiffs who otherwise would not have the economic incentive to pursue judicial redress are vested with status as equal players in the commercial marketplace. The aims of both the antitrust laws and Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are served through class actions, yet class actions also bear the potential of negatively impacting the consuming public. This is so, because district court judges considering certification motions face seemingly contradictory standards when it comes to certifying an antitrust class. As a result, plaintiff classes are often given an …
Most Claims Settle: Implications For Alternative Dispute Resolution From A Profile Of Medical Malpractice Claims In Florida, Mirya R. Holman, Neil Vidmar
Most Claims Settle: Implications For Alternative Dispute Resolution From A Profile Of Medical Malpractice Claims In Florida, Mirya R. Holman, Neil Vidmar
Mirya R Holman
The public image of medical malpractice cases is one of a courtroom, with an injured plaintiff, lawyers, and a judge. However, the reality of malpractice claims is very different. Approaching the study of alternative dispute resolution methods for medical malpractice claims with an eye towards identifying those contexts by which the claims are resolved, this article focuses on the institutional and informal processes of resolving disputes. These processes include both statutory procedural requirements and informal settlements, many of which occur prior to the filing of a lawsuit. A profile of medical malpractice claims in Florida from 1990 through 2008, indicates …