Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Certainty (1)
- Congressional control (1)
- Conveyances (1)
- Conveyancing (1)
- Deeds (1)
-
- Determinacy (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Indeterminacy (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Land patents (1)
- Land use (1)
- Linkrot (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- Objectivity (1)
- Oklahoma Appellate Courts (1)
- Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (1)
- Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (1)
- Oklahoma Supreme Court (1)
- Perma (1)
- Perma.cc (1)
- Predictability (1)
- Property rights (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Real property (1)
- Reference rot (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Statutory land grants (1)
- Statutory reservations (1)
- United States v. Klein (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Is The Internet Rotting Oklahoma Law?, Lee Peoples
Advocacy Through Briefs In The U.S. Court Of Appeals., Susan B. Haire, Laura P. Moyer
Advocacy Through Briefs In The U.S. Court Of Appeals., Susan B. Haire, Laura P. Moyer
Laura Moyer
The focus of this paper is to evaluate the role of advocates in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by examining the characterization of issues offered in appellate briefs against the issues addressed in the court's decisions. Specifically, in an environment in which attorneys are expected to frame the issues on appeal and judges are expected to respond to those issues, what accounts for judges addressing some issues while suppressing others? By explicitly focusing on how the substantive content of an opinion is shaped, we depart from other, earlier scholarship on the advantages of "repeat player" litigants …
The Irrepressible Myth Of Klein, Howard M. Wasserman
The Irrepressible Myth Of Klein, Howard M. Wasserman
Howard M Wasserman
The Reconstruction-era case of United States v. Klein remains the object of a “cult” among commentators and advocates, who see it as a powerful separation of powers precedent. In fact, Klein is a myth—actually two related myths. One is that it is opaque and meaninglessly indeterminate because, given its confusing and disjointed language, its precise doctrinal contours are indecipherable; the other is that Klein is vigorous precedent, likely to be used by a court to invalidate likely federal legislation. Close analysis of Klein, its progeny, and past scholarship uncovers three identifiable core limitations on congressional control over the workings of …
Deeds And The Determinacy Norm: Insights From Brandt And Other Cases On An Undesignated, Yet Ever-Present, Interpretive Method, Donald J. Kochan
Deeds And The Determinacy Norm: Insights From Brandt And Other Cases On An Undesignated, Yet Ever-Present, Interpretive Method, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan