Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Judicial review (3)
- Flag burning (2)
-
- Rule of law (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Academics (1)
- Advocacy (1)
- Akhil Amar (1)
- Amendment 2 (1)
- American academic legal thought (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Clear error rule (1)
- Colorado Constitution (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Constitutional text (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Constrain and control (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Doctrinal constitutional law (1)
- External perspective (1)
- Federal judges (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gay rights (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- Initiatives (1)
- Internal perspective (1)
- Interpretive errors (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Clerks In The Maze, Pierre Schlag
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opinion and the law review article. In this Article, the author criticizes the whole enterprise of doctrinal constitutional law scholarship, using a recent U.S. Supreme Court case and a Harvard Law Review article as quintessential examples of the dominant genre. In a rhetorical tour de force, the author argues that most of modern constitutional scholarship is really advocacy in the guise of scholarship. Such an approach to legal scholarship may have some merit as a strategic move towards a political end; however, it has …
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel