Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appellate court (3)
- Judges (2)
- Legal profession (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Alternatives (1)
-
- American law (1)
- Anastasoff v. United States (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate judges chosen by popular election; appellate judges chosen by Missouri Plan; (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
- Branches of government (1)
- Case briefs (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Conscientious judging (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Court opinion (1)
- Court rules (1)
- Courts (1)
- Decrease (1)
- Defenses (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Due process (1)
- En banc rehearing (1)
- Federal court (1)
- Federal court of appeals (1)
- Federal judgeship increase (1)
- Federal judgeships (1)
- Federal rules of appellate procedure (1)
- Floyd v. city of n.y. (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judge Arnold's Four Rules: A Model For A Life In The Law, Sean Unger
Judge Arnold's Four Rules: A Model For A Life In The Law, Sean Unger
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Few Thoughts On The Importance Of An Independent Judiciary, Robert E. Hirshon
A Few Thoughts On The Importance Of An Independent Judiciary, Robert E. Hirshon
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Petitions for en banc rehearings are rarely granted. A Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit provides a history and reasoning of the rehearing process and his personal observations on those petitions and processes in today's court.
Conscience, Judging, And Conscientious Judging, Gene E. Franchini
Conscience, Judging, And Conscientious Judging, Gene E. Franchini
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Judging requires applying the law instead of personal morals, philosophy, or policy of the community. Doing so requires a respect for the separation of powers between branches of government. Justice Franchini of the New Mexico Supreme Court reflects on this challenge for judges through a personal anecdote.
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
A case is made for increasing the number of federal judges. The author uses the loss of judge involvement in decisionmaking to begin his argument. The discussion then addresses the arguments against increasing federal judgeships.
From Whence Cometh Our State Appellate Judges: Popular Election Versus The Missouri Plan, Robert L. Brown
From Whence Cometh Our State Appellate Judges: Popular Election Versus The Missouri Plan, Robert L. Brown
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.