Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Aldinger v. Howard (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Federal Jurisdiction (1)
- Federal Work Incentive Program (1)
-
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Appointments (1)
- Judicial Branch (1)
- Judicial Independence (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice Rehnquist (1)
- Media (1)
- Native Americans (1)
- New Deal (1)
- New York Department of Social Services v. Dublino (1)
- Pendent Jurisdiction (1)
- Policies of Clear Statement (1)
- Presidential Influence (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Statutory Interpretation (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- The Rehnquist Court (1)
- Thomas Jefferson (1)
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington (1)
- Trump (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Sticks, Stones, And So-Called Judges: Why The Era Of Trump Necessitates Revisiting Presidential Influence On The Courts, Quinn W. Crowley
Sticks, Stones, And So-Called Judges: Why The Era Of Trump Necessitates Revisiting Presidential Influence On The Courts, Quinn W. Crowley
Indiana Law Journal
This Note will be primarily divided into three main sections. Part I of this Note will begin by discussing the importance of judicial independence in modern society and the role of elected officials in shaping the public perception of the courts. Additionally, as problems of judicial legitimacy are age-old and date back to America’s founding, Part I will include a brief discussion of an early clash between President Thomas Jefferson and the courts.
Parts II and III of this Note will seek to place President Trump’s conduct towards the judicial branch within the proper historical context. Part II examines the …
Justice Rehnquist, Statutory Interpretation, The Policies Of Clear Statement, And Federal Jurisdiction, William V. Luneburg
Justice Rehnquist, Statutory Interpretation, The Policies Of Clear Statement, And Federal Jurisdiction, William V. Luneburg
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.