Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Immigrant (2)
- 14th Amendment (1)
- 18th Amendment (1)
- 5th Amendment (1)
- AEDPA (1)
-
- Abreu v. Holder (1)
- Alcohol smuggling (1)
- American criminal justice system (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
- BIA (1)
- Black market (1)
- Board of Immigration Appeals (1)
- Border patrol (1)
- Cannabis (1)
- Cartel (1)
- Cocaine smuggling (1)
- Collateral attack (1)
- Colombia (1)
- Colombian cartel (1)
- Conviction (1)
- Coyote (1)
- Crime (1)
- Crime reporting (1)
- Criminal organizations (1)
- Davis v. United States (1)
- Deferred adjudication (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Dixon v. United States (1)
- Drug mule (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Judges
A Conversation With The Honorable Rosalie Silberman Abella And Dean Matthew Diller, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Matthew Diller
A Conversation With The Honorable Rosalie Silberman Abella And Dean Matthew Diller, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Matthew Diller
Fordham Law Review
DEAN MATTHEW DILLER: This year we are leading up to our celebration of 100 Years of Women at Fordham Law School. In September 1918, the Fordham Law faculty voted to admit women, and we are planning to celebrate that in style. But tonight perhaps is a bit of a teaser for that. Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella is a woman of firsts. She is the first Jewish woman to sit on the bench of the Supreme Court of Canada, and before the Supreme Court, when she was appointed to the Ontario Family Court in 1976, she became the first Jewish woman …
Undocumented Crime Victims: Unheard, Unnumbered, And Unprotected, Pauline Portillo
Undocumented Crime Victims: Unheard, Unnumbered, And Unprotected, Pauline Portillo
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming
Reconsidering Selective Conscientious Objection, Andrew J. Haile
Reconsidering Selective Conscientious Objection, Andrew J. Haile
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1971, in the midst of the Vietnam War, the United States Supreme Court decided that to qualify as a conscientious objector (“CO”) one must oppose all war, and not just a particular war. The Court’s decision in Gillette v. United States turned on its interpretation of section 6(j) of the Military Selective Service Act. Section 6(j) provided, in relevant part, that no person shall “be subject to combatant training and service in the armed forces of the United States who, by reason of religious training and belief, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form.” According to …
Finality Of A Conviction: A Noncitizen's Right To Procedural Due Process, Daniela Mondragon
Finality Of A Conviction: A Noncitizen's Right To Procedural Due Process, Daniela Mondragon
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Plata O Plomo: Effect Of Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations On The American Criminal Justice System, Mark M. Mcpherson
Plata O Plomo: Effect Of Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations On The American Criminal Justice System, Mark M. Mcpherson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming