Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Africa (1)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1)
- African Commission of Human Rights (1)
- African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights (1)
-
- African Court of Justice and Human Rights (1)
- African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1)
- African Union (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Enforceability (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- European Court of Justice (1)
- Forced sterilization (1)
- Human Rights Bodies (1)
- Human Rights Courts (1)
- International Court of Justice (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- International Criminal Tribunal (1)
- International Decisions Enforcement (1)
- International Judgments (1)
- International Tribunals (1)
- Judicial Sovereignty (1)
- Judicial immunity (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- National Human Rights Institutions (1)
- National Human Rights Organizations (1)
- Nongovernmental Organizations (1)
- Organization of African Unity (1)
- Remedial Orders (1)
- Reproductive rights (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
“A Sordid Case”: Stump V. Sparkman, Judicial Immunity, And The Other Side Of Reproductive Rights, Laura T. Kessler
“A Sordid Case”: Stump V. Sparkman, Judicial Immunity, And The Other Side Of Reproductive Rights, Laura T. Kessler
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Commitment To Compliance: Enforceability Of Remedial Orders Of African Human Rights Bodies, Roger-Claude Liwanga
From Commitment To Compliance: Enforceability Of Remedial Orders Of African Human Rights Bodies, Roger-Claude Liwanga
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Over the last seven decades, there has been a global proliferation of international and regional human rights tribunals. But with no coercive power to enforce their judgments, these international tribunals rely either on the good faith of the State parties or on the political process for the implementation of their remedial orders. This nonjudicial approach to enforcement has showed its limits, as most State parties are noncompliant with international judgments to the detriment of human rights victims. This article recommends a new approach involving the judicialization of the post-adjudicative stage of international proceedings as an avenue to increase the enforceability …