Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (9)
- Freedom of speech (7)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Book review (4)
- Free speech (4)
-
- Judicial review (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Advocacy (2)
- Constitutional interpretation (2)
- Extremist speech (2)
- Freedom of the press (2)
- Judges (2)
- Judiciary (2)
- Lee C. Bollinger (2)
- Nazis (2)
- Skokie (2)
- Textualism (2)
- The Tolerant Society (2)
- Tolerance (2)
- Toleration (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Academics (1)
- Adversarial system (1)
- Akhil Amar (1)
- American criminal justice system (1)
- Byron White (1)
- California (1)
- Campaigns (1)
- Campus hate codes (1)
- Censorship (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Judges
How The Supreme Court Talks About The Press (And Why We Should Care), Helen Norton
How The Supreme Court Talks About The Press (And Why We Should Care), Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
(At Least) Thirteen Ways Of Looking At Election Lies, Helen Norton
(At Least) Thirteen Ways Of Looking At Election Lies, Helen Norton
Publications
Lies take many forms. Because lies vary so greatly in their motivations and consequences (among many other qualities), philosophers have long sought to catalog them to help make sense of their diversity and complexity. Legal scholars too have classified lies in various ways to explain why we punish some and protect others. This symposium essay offers yet another taxonomy of lies, focusing specifically on election lies — that is, lies told during or about elections. We can divide and describe election lies in a wide variety of ways: by speaker, by motive, by subject matter, by audience, by means of …
Discovering Who We Are: An English Perspective On The Simpson Trial, William T. Pizzi
Discovering Who We Are: An English Perspective On The Simpson Trial, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opinion and the law review article. In this Article, the author criticizes the whole enterprise of doctrinal constitutional law scholarship, using a recent U.S. Supreme Court case and a Harvard Law Review article as quintessential examples of the dominant genre. In a rhetorical tour de force, the author argues that most of modern constitutional scholarship is really advocacy in the guise of scholarship. Such an approach to legal scholarship may have some merit as a strategic move towards a political end; however, it has …
Progressive Free Speech And The Uneasy Case For Campus Hate Codes, Robert F. Nagel
Progressive Free Speech And The Uneasy Case For Campus Hate Codes, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Teaching Tolerance, Robert F. Nagel
Freedom Of Speech As Therapy, Pierre Schlag
Book Review, Pierre Schlag
Rules And Standards, Pierre Schlag
How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.