Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 18 USC Section 1112 (1)
- 18 USC Section 7 (1)
- AHRC (1)
- ASIO (1)
- Abebe-Jiri v. Negewo (1)
-
- Abrams v. United States (1)
- Alston and Simma (1)
- American Baptist Churches v. Meese (1)
- American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh (1)
- American consul in Mexico City (1)
- Anti-Semitism (1)
- Armed Services Investigating Sub-committee (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Arrest records (1)
- Article 3(4) of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1)
- Article I Section 8 Clause 17 of the US Constitution (1)
- Article commentary (1)
- Associate Judge Nebeker (1)
- Attorney General (1)
- Australian Human Rights Commission (1)
- Australian Law Reform Commission report on Multiculturalism and the Law (1)
- Australian Security Intelligence Organization (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Bail (1)
- Barry O’Farrell (1)
- Bundeszentralregistergesetz (1)
- Canada (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Chicago Police Department (1)
- Chief Justice Marshall (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Faulty Forensics: Bolstering Judicial Gatekeeping In Georgia Courts, Miranda S. Bidinger
Faulty Forensics: Bolstering Judicial Gatekeeping In Georgia Courts, Miranda S. Bidinger
Georgia Law Review
Forensic evidence is widely used in criminal cases
across the country and is accorded great weight by
juries. But critics have begun to question its reliability.
Its use has contributed to numerous wrongful
convictions, and though some individuals have been
exonerated, many remain incarcerated for crimes they
did not commit.
This Note explores a variety of forensic science
disciplines and their associated problems, the recent
push for forensic reform, and the current standards
governing the admissibility of forensic evidence at the
federal level and in Georgia courts, highlighting the
lenient standard embodied in the Georgia Code and
elaborated upon in …
The Difficulty Of Discerning The Effect Of Neuroscience: A Peer Commentary Of Shen Et Al. 2018, John B. Meixner Jr.
The Difficulty Of Discerning The Effect Of Neuroscience: A Peer Commentary Of Shen Et Al. 2018, John B. Meixner Jr.
Scholarly Works
Neuroscience is often considered to have a certain ‘seductive allure’.1 Its mystique should not besurprising. Seeking to understand the network of nearly 100 billion neurons that make up the human brain, neuroscience examines some of the most difficult questions imaginable. And yet, it is also a deeply personal discipline—questions like, ‘How do we create memories?’ and ‘What causes emotions?’ touch on experiences shared by all people.
Does the mystique of neuroscience cause individuals to ascribe undue weight to neuroscientific findings, or assume that neuroimages indicate research quality? Over the past decade, a literature has sprung up seeking to answer questions …
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
“Criminal Records” - A Comparative Approach, Sigmund A. Cohn
“Criminal Records” - A Comparative Approach, Sigmund A. Cohn
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Erdos V. United States: Expansion Of Extraterritoriality And Revival Of Exterritoriality, Gary I. Strausberg
Erdos V. United States: Expansion Of Extraterritoriality And Revival Of Exterritoriality, Gary I. Strausberg
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Refusal To Extradite: An Examination Of Canada's Indictment Of The American Legal System, Jami Leeson
Refusal To Extradite: An Examination Of Canada's Indictment Of The American Legal System, Jami Leeson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The "Blank Stare Phenomenon": Proving Customary International Law In U.S. Courts, Paul L. Hoffman
The "Blank Stare Phenomenon": Proving Customary International Law In U.S. Courts, Paul L. Hoffman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.