Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abatement (1)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Additional evidence (1)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
- Appeals (1)
-
- Appellate court (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Appellate rulings (1)
- Appointed judges (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration award (1)
- Article III (1)
- Article III courts (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Batson/edmonson (1)
- Bifurcation (1)
- Challenges for cause (1)
- City of Keller v. Wilson (1)
- Clarification orders (1)
- Class action certification (1)
- Classified Information Procedures Act (1)
- Classified information (1)
- Conclusions of law (1)
- Damages (1)
- Default judgment (1)
- Depositions (1)
- Directed verdict (1)
- Discovery abuse (1)
- Discovery rulings (1)
- Dismissal (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Article Iii Courts V. Military Commissions: A Comparison Of Protection Of Classified Information And Admissibility Of Evidence In Terrorism Prosecutions, Mohamed Al-Hendy
Article Iii Courts V. Military Commissions: A Comparison Of Protection Of Classified Information And Admissibility Of Evidence In Terrorism Prosecutions, Mohamed Al-Hendy
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Judicial Ethics: A New Paradigm For A New Era, Charles G. Geyh
Judicial Ethics: A New Paradigm For A New Era, Charles G. Geyh
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
As the preamble to the Model Code of Judicial Conduct indicates, traditional notions of judicial ethics operate within a rule of law paradigm, which posits that the “three I’s” of judicial ethics—independence, impartiality, and integrity—enable judges to uphold the law. In recent decades, however, social science, public opinion, and political commentary suggest that appointed judges abuse their independence by disregarding the law and issuing rulings in accord with their biases and other extralegal impulses, while elected judges disregard the law and issue rulings popular with voters, all of which calls the future of the three I’s and judicial ethics itself …