Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judges (8)
- Elections (7)
- Judicial elections (6)
- Supreme court (6)
- Judiciary (4)
-
- Appellate court (3)
- Arkansas (3)
- Citizens united (3)
- Judicial (3)
- Judicial campaigns (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Legal profession (3)
- Amendment 80 (2)
- Arkansas supreme court (2)
- Campaign (2)
- Campaigning (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Corruption (2)
- Court rules (2)
- Courts (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Judicial opinion (2)
- Judicial workload (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Opinion (2)
- Oral argument (2)
- Politics (2)
- Us supreme court (2)
- ABA (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Judges
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Slumping: The Eighth Circuit’S Supreme Court Batting Average In Federal-Sentencing Cases, Mark W. Bennett
Slumping: The Eighth Circuit’S Supreme Court Batting Average In Federal-Sentencing Cases, Mark W. Bennett
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judicial Elections And Issue Advertising: A Two-State Study, Christopher Terry, Mitchell T. Bard
Judicial Elections And Issue Advertising: A Two-State Study, Christopher Terry, Mitchell T. Bard
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of Popular Elections, Former Justice Robert L. Brown
In Defense Of Popular Elections, Former Justice Robert L. Brown
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tailored Judicial Selection, Dmitry Bam
Tailored Judicial Selection, Dmitry Bam
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Why Amending The Consitution To Overrule Citizens United Is The Wrong Way To Fix Campaign Finance In The United States, Zachary Hale
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Putting Equality To A Vote: Individual Rights, Judicial Elections, And The Arkansas Supreme Court, Billy Corriher
Putting Equality To A Vote: Individual Rights, Judicial Elections, And The Arkansas Supreme Court, Billy Corriher
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Living With Judicial Elections, Raymond J. Mckoski
Living With Judicial Elections, Raymond J. Mckoski
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Great Use And Interest: Constitutional Governance And Judicial Power- The History Of The California Supreme Court, Donald Warner
Of Great Use And Interest: Constitutional Governance And Judicial Power- The History Of The California Supreme Court, Donald Warner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Extended Vacancies, Crushing Caseloads, And Emergency Panels In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Andrew L. Adler
Extended Vacancies, Crushing Caseloads, And Emergency Panels In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Andrew L. Adler
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Assessing And Addressing The Problems Caused By Life Tenure On The Supreme Court, Philip D. Oliver
Assessing And Addressing The Problems Caused By Life Tenure On The Supreme Court, Philip D. Oliver
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Setting The Record Straight On State V. John Ingram Purtle: Reflections On The Great Dissenter, Samuel A. Perroni
Setting The Record Straight On State V. John Ingram Purtle: Reflections On The Great Dissenter, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - The Supreme Court Expands The Witt Principles To Exclude A Juror Who Would Follow The Law. Uttecht V. Brown, 127 S. Ct. 2218 (2007)., Brooke A. Thompson
Criminal Law - The Supreme Court Expands The Witt Principles To Exclude A Juror Who Would Follow The Law. Uttecht V. Brown, 127 S. Ct. 2218 (2007)., Brooke A. Thompson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Amendment 80 Judicial Politics In Arkansas: Have The Changes Undermined The Argument For Selection By Appointment?, Jay Barth
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Role Of Appellate Courts: A View From The Supreme Court, Stephen G. Breyer
Reflections On The Role Of Appellate Courts: A View From The Supreme Court, Stephen G. Breyer
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Getting To Know Us: Judicial Outreach In Oregon, Mary J. Deits, Lora E. Keenan
Getting To Know Us: Judicial Outreach In Oregon, Mary J. Deits, Lora E. Keenan
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Illusion Of Devil's Advocacy: How The Justices Of The Supreme Court Foreshadow Their Decisions During Oral Argument, Sarah Levien Shullman
The Illusion Of Devil's Advocacy: How The Justices Of The Supreme Court Foreshadow Their Decisions During Oral Argument, Sarah Levien Shullman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Assessing Judgeship Needs In The Federal Courts Of Appeals: Policy Choices And Process Concerns, Arthur D. Hellman
Assessing Judgeship Needs In The Federal Courts Of Appeals: Policy Choices And Process Concerns, Arthur D. Hellman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Petitions for en banc rehearings are rarely granted. A Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit provides a history and reasoning of the rehearing process and his personal observations on those petitions and processes in today's court.
The Impact Of Science On Legal Decisions: What Can Social Science Tell The Courts And Lawyers?, Theresa M. Beiner
The Impact Of Science On Legal Decisions: What Can Social Science Tell The Courts And Lawyers?, Theresa M. Beiner
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Appellate Judges In Intermediate Courts, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Role Of Appellate Judges In Intermediate Courts, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The editor begins with commentary on the role of an appellate judge and then provides follow-up on previous articles dealing with New Mexico appellate mediation and also prosecutorial misconduct.
Judicial Lobbying And Court Reform: U.S. Magistrate Judges And The Judicial Improvements Act Of 1990, Christopher E. Smith
Judicial Lobbying And Court Reform: U.S. Magistrate Judges And The Judicial Improvements Act Of 1990, Christopher E. Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.