Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Congress (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
-
- Confirmation (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutionalism (1)
- Counter majoritarian (1)
- Court (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Decisions (1)
- Ideology (1)
- In Defense of a Political Court (1)
- Judge (1)
- Justice (1)
- Law (1)
- Liberal scholarship (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Peretti (Terri) (1)
- Politics (1)
- Pursuit of Justices: Presidential Politics and the Selection of Supreme Court Nominees (1)
- Senate (1)
- Social value (1)
- State right (1)
- Statutory right (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (1)
- Tenth amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Michigan Law Review
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and constitutional judicial review really can make a difference. Gerald Rosenberg, for example, in The Hollow Hope, expressly questions whether judicial review achieves effective social change. Similarly, Michael Klarman explores whether the Supreme Court's desegregation decisions were effective, except insofar as they produced a right-wing backlash that induced action to desegregate. In Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Mark Tushnet approvingly invokes these arguments (pp. 137, 145), but he goes much further. Professor Tushnet contends that, on balance, constitutional judicial review is harmful. He …
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Michigan Law Review
William H. Rehnquist is not going to be Chief Justice forever - much to the chagrin of Republicans, no doubt. In the last century, Supreme Court Justices have retired, on average, at the age of seventy-one after approximately fourteen years on the bench. By the end of the term of the President we elect this November, Chief Justice Rehnquist will have served on the Supreme Court for thirty-two years and reached the age of eighty. The law of averages suggests that Chief Justice Rehnquist is likely to retire in the next presidential term. In addition to replacing Chief Justice Rehnquist, …
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.