Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion; Civil Rights; Fundamental Rights; Privacy; Gender; Feminism; Supreme Court of the United States; Precedent; Roe v. Wade; Reproductive Rights; Constitutional Law; Precedent; Overrule; Activism; Judicial Activism; State Courts; Law and Politics; Law and Society (1)
- Campaign contributions; Campaign finance irregularities; Campaign finance limits; Campaign Finance reform; Corruption; Democracy; Election Reform; Excessive Political Spending; Federal Election Campaign Act; Federal Election Commission; Financial Reporting; First Amendment; Political speech; Superpacs; Supression of the First Amendment (1)
- First Amendment; Campaign finance limits; Campaign contributions; Federal Election Campaign Act; Excessive Political Spending; Election Reform; Democracy; Campaign finance irregularities; Supression of the First Amendment; Financial Reporting; Federal Election Commission; Campaign Finance reform; Political speech; Corruption; Superpacs (1)
- Town and Village; justice courts; New York; district court model; judicial misconduct; judicial education; municipal courts; justice of the peace; discrimination; constitutional rights; Due Process Clause; community justice; civil liberties; court reform modernization; Uniform District Court Act; New York Constitution (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Book Review: The Mighty Roe Has Fallen (Probably): A Call To Action As An Antidote To Despair, Loreen Peritz
Book Review: The Mighty Roe Has Fallen (Probably): A Call To Action As An Antidote To Despair, Loreen Peritz
Journal of Law and Policy
Reviewing CONTROLLING WOMEN: WHAT WE MUST DO NOW TO SAVE REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM. By Kathryn Kolbert & Julie Kay. New York, NY: Hachette Books, 2021. 304 pp., $29.00
A Firm Pillar Of Local Justice: The Failures Of The New York Town And Village Justice Courts Supporting Statewide Adoption Of The District Court Model, Noah Sexton
Journal of Law and Policy
Town and village justice courts have been the center of municipal law, both civil and criminal, since the mid-nineteenth century. However, in the modern world, they have become corrupt, poorly managed institutions, creating issues involving procedural integrity and civil rights. In order to remedy these failures and modernize the New York State Unified Court System, state legislators must look to the district court model as it currently exists in Nassau and Eastern Suffolk Counties. The district court model offers several benefits, including the imposition of educational and experiential requirements for judges, the creation of internal and external oversight institutions, the …
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This short paper introduces the papers and commentary produced at two significant First Amendment occasions. First was a 40th anniversary celebration of the Supreme Court’s landmark 1976 decision in Buckley v. Valeo, the fountainhead ruling on the intersection between campaign finance restrictions and First Amendment rights. The questions were discussed provocatively by two of the leading players in that decision, James Buckley himself, now a retired United States Circuit Judge, and Ira Glasser, former head of the ACLU who helped organize a strange bedfellows, left-right coalition to challenge the new federal election campaign laws on First Amendment grounds. …
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the most speech-protective Supreme Court in memory. In a series of wide-ranging First Amendment decisions, the Court sounded and strengthened classic free speech themes and principles. Taken together, the Roberts Court’s decisions have left free speech rights much stronger than they were found.
Those themes and principles include a strong libertarian distrust of government regulation of speech and presumption in favor of letting people control speech, a consistent refusal to fashion new “non-speech” categories, a reluctance to “balance” free speech away against governmental interests, …