Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Decision making (1)
-
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- Generalism (1)
- Incrementalism (1)
- Institutional realism (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Trade (1)
- Investment law; domestic courts; arbitration (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial decision-making (1)
- Judicial virtues (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1)
- Multilateral agreement (1)
- National interest (1)
- Partnerships (1)
- Precedents (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Trade Regulation (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- United States v. Microsoft Corp. (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Investment Dispute Resolution Under The Transpacific Partnership Agreement: Prelude To A Slippery Slope?, Leon E. Trakman Professor
Investment Dispute Resolution Under The Transpacific Partnership Agreement: Prelude To A Slippery Slope?, Leon E. Trakman Professor
Leon E Trakman Dean
Intense debate is currently brewing over the multistate negotiation of the Transpacific Partnership Agreement [TPPA], led by the United States. The TPPA will be the largest trade and investment agreement after the European Union, with trillions of investment dollars at stake. However, there is little understanding of the complex issues involved in regulating inbound and outbound investment. The negotiating of the TPPA is shrouded in both mystery and dissension among negotiating countries. NGOs, investor and legal interest groups heatedly debate how the TPPA ought to regulate international investment. However this dissension is resolved, it will have enormous economic, political and …
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Although commentators frequently debate how judges should decide antitrust cases substantively, little attention has been paid to theories of judicial virtue in antitrust decision making. This essay considers four pairings of virtues: (1) striving for substantive purity versus conceding to institutional realism; (2) incrementalism versus generalism; (3) presenting a unified face versus candidly conceding differences among judges on an appellate panel; and (4) adhering strictly to stare decisis versus freely updating precedents to reflect evolving economic learning or conditions. While recognizing the complexities that sometimes pull judges in the opposite direction, this Article gives the nod to institutional realism, incrementalism, …