Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Adult Criminal Court (1)
- County (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- In re Gault (1)
- Indigency (1)
- JJDPA (1)
- Juvenile Code (1)
- Juvenile Court (1)
- Juvenile Delinquency (1)
- Juvenile Judge (1)
- Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (1)
- Juvenile Proceeding (1)
- Kent v. United States (1)
- Parens Patriae (1)
- Public Interest (1)
- Raise-the-Age (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Right to Counsel (1)
- Self-Incrimination (1)
- Waiver (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Partnership Lost, Christine Hurt
Partnership Lost, Christine Hurt
University of Richmond Law Review
A century ago, two distinct business entities existed that could best be defined by describing either one of them as simply not the other. The corporation and the general partnership were mirror images of one another and opposites on a spectrum of corporate governance, limited liability, and taxation. Partnerships, seen as small, livelihood enterprises between active-owner partners, had personal liability but pass-through taxation. Corporations, seen as larger, capital-intensive enterprises with passive-owner shareholders, had limited liability but double taxation. The tax distinctions survive today, but the stereotypical partnership does not; in fact, the modern partnership is more corporation-like than partnership-like.
Today, …
When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry
When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the Supreme Court declined to extend these Due Process rights to children. Initially, common-law courts treated child offenders over the age of seven in the same manner as adult criminals. At the start of the 20th century, though, juvenile reformers assisted in creating unique juvenile courts that used the parens patriae doctrine and viewed children as delinquent youths in need of judicial parental guidance rather than punishment. Later, starting in 1967, the Supreme Court released multiple opinions extending certain constitutional Due Process rights to children in juvenile delinquency …