Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Advocacy for Guantanamo terrorism detainees (1)
- Crossover advocacy (1)
- Cuban Missile Crisis (1)
- Damage to United States credibility (1)
- Detention (1)
-
- Dialogic disposition (1)
- Evolving national security policy (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Harakat al-Nujaba (1)
- Ideology and national security (1)
- Institutional consequences (1)
- Internet exceptionalism (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Iran (1)
- Israel (1)
- Lawfare criticism (1)
- Lawyering through the media (1)
- Legal ethics and national security policy (1)
- Legal responses to terrorism (1)
- Lend-lease (1)
- OLC memos (1)
- Over regulation (1)
- Participant centered view (1)
- Post 9-11 legal action (1)
- Pros and cons of asymmetrical accountability mechanisms (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Strategies for defending terrorists (1)
- Syria (1)
- Syrian Golan legitimacy (1)
- Terrorist organizations (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in International Law
Containing Iran And Maintaining Legitimacy, Peter Margulies
Containing Iran And Maintaining Legitimacy, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Detainees' Dilemma: The Virtues And Vices Of Advocacy Strategies In The War On Terror, Peter Margulies
The Detainees' Dilemma: The Virtues And Vices Of Advocacy Strategies In The War On Terror, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
True Believers At Law: National Security Agendas, The Regulation Of Lawyers, And The Separation Of Powers, Peter Margulies
True Believers At Law: National Security Agendas, The Regulation Of Lawyers, And The Separation Of Powers, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
Ideological agendas distort the deliberation required for sound legal advice about national security. Elite government lawyers after September 11 advanced a theory at the expense of context, labeling legal constraints as "lawfare" against American interests. The lawfare critics failed to recognize that legal constraints can empower decision makers by reinforcing reputational and other long-term values. They also failed their history test, ignoring the lessons of presidents from Jefferson to Kennedy who rejected a rigid adherence to ideology in the national security realm. By discounting context, the construction of the lawfare paradigm produced dire results, including the torture memos drafted by …
When To Push The Envelope: Legal Ethics, The Rule Of Law, And National Security Strategy Legal Issues Surrounding Guantanamo Bay, Peter Margulies
When To Push The Envelope: Legal Ethics, The Rule Of Law, And National Security Strategy Legal Issues Surrounding Guantanamo Bay, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
When To Push The Envelope: Legal Ethics, The Rule Of Law, And National Security Strategy, Peter Margulies
When To Push The Envelope: Legal Ethics, The Rule Of Law, And National Security Strategy, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.