Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
International Humanitarian Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law review articles (1)
- Law-related scholarship (1)
- Legal podcast (1)
- Palestine; PLO; Palestine Liberation Organization; United Nations; Hyderabad; Ossetia; U.N.; jus cogens; jus in bello; jus ad bellum; Treaties; Treaty Regimes; UNESCOl WHO; IMF; ICC (1)
- Statehood; Relative Statehood; Functional Statehood; De Facto Statehood; De Jure Statehood; Quasi-Statehoood; ex injuria non jus oritur; Contemporary International Law; Customary International Law; International Law; Legal Personality; Private Rights; Human Rights; International Criminal Law; Use of Force; Immunity (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in International Humanitarian Law
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law, William Thomas Worster
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law, William Thomas Worster
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The international community lacks a form of territorial-based, international legal personality distinct from statehood, and yet, non-state, territorial entities of varying degrees of autonomy or independence need to function within the international community in some form. Some of these entities cannot be recognized as states because their creation violates jus cogens norms, though others are not recognized based on an assessment that they may not fully qualify as a state or that there are political reasons to refuse recognition. However, existing states still need to engage with these territorial quasi-states through the only paradigm the international community has—statehood. For example, …
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Seattle University Law Review
Ipse Dixit, the podcast on legal scholarship, provides a valuable service to the legal community and particularly to the legal academy. The podcast’s hosts skillfully interview guests about their legal and law-related scholarship, helping those guests communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. In this review essay, I argue that Ipse Dixit has made a major contribution to legal scholarship by demonstrating in its interview episodes that law review articles are neither the only nor the best way of communicating scholarly ideas. This contribution should be considered “scholarship,” because one of the primary goals of scholarship is to communicate new ideas.